The CONDUCT‐AF trial: Rationale and design of a prospective, randomized, multicentre study comparing conduction system and biventricular pacing in patients undergoing atrioventricular node ablation for heart failure with atrial fibrillation
Maja Ivanovski, Miha Mrak, Anja Zupan Mežnar, Matevž Jan, Catalin Pestrea, Sandro Brusich, Peter Bogyi, Sebastiaan Dhont, Zrinka Jurišić, Vassil Traykov, Borka Pezo Nikolić, Wilfried Mullens, David Žižek

TL;DR
This study compares two heart pacing methods in patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation to see which improves heart function and outcomes better.
Contribution
The trial introduces a novel comparison of conduction system pacing versus biventricular pacing in patients undergoing AVNA for heart failure and AF.
Findings
The trial will assess whether conduction system pacing is non-inferior to biventricular pacing in improving LVEF.
It will evaluate clinical outcomes like heart failure worsening and cardiovascular death.
Quality of life and safety outcomes will also be analyzed over a 24-month follow-up.
Abstract
There is a lack of data from randomized clinical trials comparing treatment outcomes between conduction system pacing (CSP) modalities and biventricular pacing (BVP) in symptomatic patients with refractory atrial fibrillation (AF) scheduled for atrioventricular node ablation (AVNA). The CONDUCT‐AF investigates whether CSP is non‐inferior to BVP in improving left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and clinical outcomes in heart failure (HF) patients with symptomatic AF undergoing AVNA. This study is an investigator‐initiated, prospective, randomized, multicentre clinical trial conducted across 10 European centres, enrolling 82 patients with symptomatic AF, HF with reduced LVEF, and narrow QRS. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to CSP or BVP with subsequent AVNA and followed for at least 24 months. The primary endpoint is the change in LVEF after 6 months. Secondary endpoints will…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCardiac pacing and defibrillation studies · Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments · Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
