Long-term Effects of 3-Month Home-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation Using Information and Communication Technology for Heart Failure with Physical Frailty
Yuta Nagatomi, Tomomi Ide, Takeo Fujino, Takeshi Tohyama, Tae Higuchi, Tomoyuki Nezu, Takuya Nagata, Toru Hashimoto, Shouji Matsushima, Keisuke Shinohara, Tomiko Yokoyama, Masataka Ikeda, Shintaro Kinugawa, Hiroyuki Tsutsui, Kohtaro Abe

TL;DR
This study found that a 3-month home-based cardiac rehab program using technology improved heart failure patients' walking ability and frailty, but these benefits faded over 12 months without ongoing professional support.
Contribution
The study is one of the first to evaluate long-term outcomes of ICT-based home cardiac rehab in heart failure patients with physical frailty.
Findings
6-minute walking distance improved significantly at 3 months but declined by 15 months.
Frailty scores decreased at 3 months but worsened by 15 months.
Patients who continued exercising maintained walking improvements at 15 months.
Abstract
Information and communication technology (ICT)-supported home-based cardiac rehabilitation (HBCR) has gained prominence because of its potential advantages, including improved patient engagement. However, the long-term effects on patients with heart failure (HF) and physical frailty are unclear. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of HBCR on patients with HF and physical frailty 12 months after the HBCR intervention. This single-centre, single-arm intervention trial included 30 outpatients with chronic HF and physical frailty or pre-frailty. Participants received a comprehensive ICT-based HBCR intervention, including disease management, exercise, and nutritional guidance for 3 months, followed by a 12-month period of ICT-supported self-management without professional guidance. The primary outcome was the change in 6-minute walking distance (6MWD). The 6MWD of the…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCardiac Health and Mental Health · Cardiovascular and exercise physiology · Health and Wellbeing Research
