# Successful thrombolysis of portal vein thrombosis induced by post-liver transplant splenectomy: a case report

## TL;DR

A liver transplant patient developed portal vein thrombosis after splenectomy and successfully responded to thrombolysis with urokinase, offering a treatment option for similar cases.

## Contribution

Demonstrates the successful use of peripheral urokinase infusion for post-splenectomy portal vein thrombosis in a liver transplant recipient.

## Key findings

- Thrombosis resolved after intravenous heparin and urokinase thrombolysis in a post-LT splenectomy patient.
- Peripheral urokinase infusion may be a viable alternative to invasive thrombolysis for PVT in this patient population.
- Long-term anticoagulation is essential to prevent recurrence in these high-risk patients.

## Abstract

Liver transplantation (LT) is a life-saving procedure for patients with end-stage liver disease, but post-transplant complications, such as portal vein thrombosis (PVT), can significantly impact patient outcomes. PVT is particularly challenging when it occurs after splenectomy, which is sometimes necessary in LT recipients with persistent hypersplenism or thrombocytopenia. The optimal management of PVT in this context remains unclear, and further clinical insights are needed.

We present a case of a 57-year-old male with a history of chronic hepatitis B-induced liver cirrhosis who underwent LT. Due to persistent hypersplenism and thrombocytopenia, the patient later underwent splenectomy. One month post-splenectomy, the patient developed PVT, which was initially managed with anticoagulation therapy (aspirin and rivaroxaban). Despite treatment, thrombosis progressed, requiring intravenous heparin and urokinase thrombolysis. Serial imaging confirmed thrombus resolution, and the patient was discharged on long-term anticoagulation therapy.

PVT following splenectomy in LT patients is a complex and potentially life-threatening condition influenced by altered portal hemodynamics and a hypercoagulable state. The standard treatment involves anticoagulation, but there is no consensus on the optimal regimen in post-transplant patients. This case highlights the potential efficacy of peripheral urokinase infusion as an alternative to interventional thrombolysis, particularly for patients who refuse invasive procedures. Long-term anticoagulation and close monitoring are crucial to prevent recurrence.

This case underscores the importance of early detection, tailored anticoagulation strategies, and a multidisciplinary approach in managing PVT following splenectomy in LT recipients. Peripheral urokinase infusion may serve as a viable treatment option for patients with contraindications or reluctance toward invasive procedures. Further studies are needed to optimize anticoagulation protocols and long-term management strategies in this patient population.