# Urinary C-peptide creatinine ratio as a non-invasive diagnostic tool for differentiating type 1 from type 2 diabetes mellitus in adult Emirati population: a prospective validation study

**Authors:** Fayez Alshamsi, Afrin Pathan, Javed Yasin, Charu Sharma, Hussain Abdalla Alshemsi, Abdelrahman Alblooshi, Mohamed Abdulkareem AlAwadhi, Ahmad Abdulrazak Alali, Maitha Alkuwaiti, Bachar Afandi, Juma AlKaabi, Adnan Agha

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1687920 · Frontiers in Endocrinology · 2025-10-16

## TL;DR

A urine test called UCPCR can accurately and affordably tell the difference between Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes in adults from the UAE.

## Contribution

Validated UCPCR as a non-invasive, cost-effective diagnostic tool for T1DM vs T2DM in the Emirati population.

## Key findings

- UCPCR < 0.25 nmol/mmol achieved 100% sensitivity and 91.7% specificity for T1DM diagnosis.
- UCPCR was the strongest independent predictor of T1DM in multivariable regression analysis.
- UCPCR testing reduced healthcare costs by ≥90% compared to serum C-peptide or autoantibody panels.

## Abstract

The precise differentiation between Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) can be challenging in clinical practice, particularly in adults. We aimed to validate the diagnostic accuracy and performance of urinary C-peptide creatinine ratio (UCPCR) for distinguishing T1DM from T2DM in the Emirati population.

This prospective cross-sectional study included 79 patients with diabetes (19 T1DM, 60 T2DM) from Tawam Hospital Diabetes Center, UAE. Post-prandial urine samples were collected for UCPCR measurement using chemiluminescent immunoassay. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis determined optimal cut-offs. Multivariable logistic regression and cost-comparison analyses were performed.

Mean UCPCR was significantly lower in T1DM compared to T2DM (0.29 ± 0.64 vs 1.44 ± 1.82 nmol/mmol, p<0.001). ROC analysis revealed that a UCPCR cut-off of <0.25 nmol/mmol achieved 100% sensitivity and 91.7% specificity for T1DM diagnosis (AUC 0.991, 95% CI: 0.978-1.000). In patients with diabetes duration <5 years, UCPCR maintained excellent discrimination (AUC 0.988, sensitivity 100%, specificity 91.7%). However, specificity declined in patients with a diabetes duration of >10 years (82.4%), with 15% of these longstanding T2DM patients exhibiting UCPCR values <0.25 nmol/mmol, reflecting progressive beta-cell decline. Multivariable regression identified UCPCR (OR 0.001; 95% CI: 0.000–0.012; p<0.001) as the strongest independent predictor of T1DM. Cost-comparison analysis demonstrated ≥ 90% cost reduction when compared with serum C-peptide or autoantibody panels.

UCPCR < 0.25 nmol/mmol accurately identifies T1DM in the Emirati population. This cost-effective, non-invasive test could improve clinical practice through enhanced diagnostic accuracy and reduced healthcare costs.

Study results on using UC-PCR to differentiate Type 1 from Type 2 diabetes in Emirati adults. Study design: 79 patients, single post-meal urine sample collected 2-4 hours after a meal. Diagnostic performance: 100% sensitivity, 91.7% specificity, AUC 0.991. Cost-effectiveness shows UC-PCR is significantly cheaper ( content-type="machine-generated"4) than serum C-peptide ( content-type="machine-generated"36) and antibody panel ($327). Key advantages include non-invasiveness, room temperature stability for 72 hours, optimal threshold of less than 0.25 nanomoles per millimole, and best performance within 5 years of diagnosis. Conclusion emphasizes UC-PCR's accuracy and cost-effectiveness.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** Type 1 diabetes mellitus (MONDO:0005147), Type 2 diabetes mellitus (MONDO:0005148)

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** INS (insulin) [NCBI Gene 3630] {aka IDDM, IDDM1, IDDM2, ILPR, IRDN, MODY10}
- **Diseases:** Diabetes (MESH:D003920), T2DM (MESH:D003924), T1DM (MESH:D003922)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12571621/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12571621/full.md

## References

29 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12571621/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12571621