# Exploring dairy heifers’ consistency in social motivation in the absence or presence of conspecifics

## TL;DR

This study shows that dairy heifers' sociability varies depending on the situation and is not a consistent trait.

## Contribution

The study challenges the idea of sociability as a stable trait by showing it is context-dependent in cattle.

## Key findings

- Sociability measures were inconsistent across different social contexts.
- Behaviors showed low repeatability within the same context.
- Individual differences in sociability may result from internal and external factors.

## Abstract

Cattle are motivated to maintain social contact, but individual preference for social proximity (i.e., ‘sociability’) varies among individuals. Although personality traits, like sociability, are generally considered to be consistent across context and time, different social environments may elicit different behavioral responses in individuals. We tested individual differences in social motivation with and without the presence of conspecifics, and compared responses within and among different social contexts. Specifically, Holstein heifers (n = 36) were exposed to standardized social isolation tests (novel arena, novel object, runway test; each tested twice, 14 days apart) and a novel social-feed trade-off paradigm. In addition, heifers were subjected to a distribution test in which groups of three animals could freely move between two feed troughs. At one trough, heifers were offered 150 g of grain every two minutes (high side) and every four minutes at the other trough (low side). We expected animals to disperse proportionally to resource availability, corresponding with the Ideal Free Distribution theory (IFD), and that deviations from IFD would reveal individual differences in motivation to be with peers. We found no consistency in sociability measures derived from behaviors in the absence (vocalization, runway latency) and presence (feeding time, social-feed trade-off score) of conspecifics. Moreover, behaviors showed low repeatability within the same social contexts. We conclude that individual differences in sociability are likely context-dependent. We suggest that sociability might not be a single ‘trait’, but rather a ‘behavioral consequence’ resulting from the combined effects of internal characteristics (e.g., other personality traits such as fearfulness) and external factors (e.g., testing environment) at the time of evaluation.