# Mixed-methods process evaluation of ctDNA use to guide decision-making in patients with advanced solid cancers: study protocol for a substudy of the LIQPLAT trial

**Authors:** Johannes M Schwenke, Andreas M Schmitt, Stuart McLennan, Perrine Janiaud, Heinz Läubli, Mascha Binder, Ilaria Alborelli, Matthias S Matter, Jennifer Hinke, Corinne C Widmer, Lars G Hemkens, Benjamin Kasenda, Matthias Briel

PMC · DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100537 · BMJ Open · 2025-10-28

## TL;DR

This study explores how to integrate ctDNA testing into routine care for advanced cancer patients through a mixed-methods process evaluation.

## Contribution

The study introduces a mixed-methods process evaluation framework to assess ctDNA implementation in cancer care.

## Key findings

- The study will use semistructured interviews and surveys to identify barriers and facilitators in ctDNA implementation.
- Quantitative data from hospital records will assess patient acceptance rates and ctDNA workflow success.
- Qualitative and quantitative analyses will be combined to evaluate the normalization of ctDNA in clinical practice.

## Abstract

There is an urgent need to better understand how information from circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) can be integrated into routine care for patients with advanced solid cancer.

The implementation of liquid biopsies in routine care of patients with advanced solid cancer trial (LIQPLAT) is a single-centre, single-arm trial investigating the implementation of ctDNA in the routine care of patients with advanced solid cancer. We present a mixed-methods process evaluation embedded in the LIQPLAT trial, following Medical Research Council guidance and the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance framework. We show a logic model, which details the causal chain and related assumptions from recruiting patients into the trial to the goal of improving quality of life and survival. Data collection is longitudinal and includes: semistructured interviews with healthcare professionals (pathologists, biologists, oncologists; planned n=20) and patients (planned n=15) to identify implementation barriers and facilitators; recordings of molecular tumour board meetings to analyse clinical decision-making; the 23-item Normalisation MeAsure Development survey for healthcare professionals (planned n=20) at four time points. Quantitative data from hospital records will be used to assess implementation outcomes like patient acceptance rates and ctDNA workflow success. Qualitative data will undergo thematic and content analysis, and quantitative data will be analysed using a Bayesian framework.

The LIQPLAT trial was approved by the regional ethics committee of Northwestern and Central Switzerland (BASEC 2024-00358). The qualitative aspects of the process evaluation were exempted from ethics review according to the Swiss Human Research Act. We follow guidelines for data security, confidentiality and information governance. Results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals and discussed at conferences.

NCT06367751, SNCTP000005844.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** cancer (MESH:D009369)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12570924/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12570924/full.md

## References

18 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12570924/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12570924