# Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Concerns From JAMA Network Peer Reviewers

**Authors:** Michael O. Mensah, Anand R. Habib, Jacob Kendall-Taylor, Mya L. Roberson, Kanade Shinkai, Annette Flanagin, Preeti N. Malani

PMC · DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.39886 · JAMA Network Open · 2025-10-28

## TL;DR

This study examines how JAMA Network peer reviewers use a checkbox for equity, diversity, and inclusion concerns, focusing on JAMA Dermatology.

## Contribution

The study introduces a novel analysis of peer reviewers' use of an equity, diversity, and inclusion checkbox in a medical journal.

## Key findings

- Peer reviewers infrequently used the equity, diversity, and inclusion checkbox.
- Confidential comments revealed a range of concerns related to EDI in JAMA Dermatology.
- Findings suggest opportunities for improving EDI practices in peer review.

## Abstract

This cross-sectional study evaluates JAMA Network peer reviewers’ use of the equity, diversity, and inclusion concerns checkbox and used JAMA Dermatology as a case study to categorize concerns described in confidential comments.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** EDI (MESH:D003586)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12569707/full.md

## References

5 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12569707/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12569707