# A wide range of abiotic and biotic variables leaves most variation in bird nest architecture unexplained

**Authors:** Michał T. Jezierski, Roger B. J. Benson, William J. Smith, Erin E. Saupe, Sonya M. Clegg

PMC · DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2025.2013 · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · 2025-10-29

## TL;DR

This study explores how environmental factors influence bird nest architecture, finding that abiotic factors explain more variation than biotic ones, though much remains unexplained.

## Contribution

The study introduces a multivariate analysis of nest traits across 3685 bird species to compare abiotic and biotic influences on nest architecture.

## Key findings

- Abiotic environmental factors explain more variation in bird nest architecture than biotic factors.
- A significant portion of variation in nest architecture remains unexplained after accounting for tested variables.
- The study highlights the need for more diverse nest traits and environmental variables to better understand nest evolution.

## Abstract

Nests are the locations or containers for offspring, and mediate interactions between offspring and the environment. However, understanding how environmental factors shape the evolution of nest architecture is complicated. In particular, the relative contributions of biotic (e.g. protection from predation) and abiotic (e.g. microclimate maintenance) factors to the evolution of nest architecture have not been clearly quantified, and multiple nest traits, such as their location or shape, are rarely considered together. Here, we use a dataset of 3685 bird species for which data exist across multiple nest traits to characterize a multivariate ‘morphospace’ of nest architecture and use phylogenetic comparative methods to explore whether abiotic or biotic factors better explain this variation. We detect that abiotic environmental factors (climate) explain more variation than biotic factors. However, substantial variation in nest architecture remains unexplained after accounting for the variables used here, suggesting that commonly used nest traits may not capture covariation between nest architecture and the environment as expected. Nonetheless, our study demonstrates how nest evolution is affected by the environment on a global scale. This provides a foundation to explore a more diverse array of nest traits and environmental variables, to better understand nest evolution in the world’s birds.

## Full-text entities

- **Species:** Ptyonoprogne (genus) [taxon 72889], Philetairus socius (sociable weaver, species) [taxon 247666], Gerygone mouki (brown gerygone, species) [taxon 117495], Gygis alba (common white-tern, species) [taxon 297809], Chasiempis sandwichensis (elepaio, species) [taxon 291285], Timaliidae (babblers, family) [taxon 9173], Scopus umbretta (hamerkop, species) [taxon 33581], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12569471/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12569471/full.md

## References

69 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12569471/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12569471