Non-Operative Considerations in Relation to Parastomal Hernia
Z. Malaibari, M. W. Christoffersen, M. Krogsgaard, N. A. Henriksen, K. Andresen, F. Helgstrand, R. Aldemyati, J. Rosenberg

TL;DR
This review discusses non-surgical approaches for managing parastomal hernias, emphasizing conservative care and the need for more targeted research.
Contribution
The paper synthesizes current evidence on non-operative strategies for parastomal hernia and highlights research gaps.
Findings
Conservative management is widely accepted for asymptomatic patients with comparable outcomes to surgery.
Abdominal binders and core training show promise but lack high-quality evidence specific to parastomal hernias.
Stoma care and psychosocial support are critical but underrepresented in guidelines.
Abstract
Parastomal hernia (PSH) is a frequent and challenging complication following stoma formation. While operative repair remains an important option in selected cases, non-operative strategies are essential, particularly for asymptomatic patients or those with significant comorbidities. This narrative review aims to synthesize current evidence on conservative management of PSH and on selected perioperative supportive measures, outlining core components, limitations, and research priorities. A narrative review of the literature was conducted focusing on non-operative strategies in PSH, including watchful waiting, core training, abdominal support garments, stoma care, and psychosocial considerations. Relevant publications were identified through searches in PubMed and Google Scholar (2011–2025) and supplemented by expert consultation. In patients with minimal symptoms, conservative approach…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
| Domain | Practical recommendations |
|---|---|
| Watchful waiting | Conservative approach is a widely accepted strategy as surgical repair is associated with high recurrence and complication rates |
| Physical Activity | Encourage guided core training and gradual return to activity to preserve abdominal wall function |
| Abdominal binders | Use in symptomatic patients for comfort and mobility; exercise caution in non-reducible PSH, ensure specialized stoma nurse assessment, check appliance compatibility, and provide education on correct use |
| Stoma care and appliance management | Ensure individualized fitting and education by a specialized stoma nurse, with appliance modifications to prevent leakage and skin complications |
| psychosocial impact | Offer counseling to address emotional distress and utilize validated QoL assessment tools |
| Multidisciplinary care | Foster collaboration among surgeons, physiotherapists and specialized stoma nurses |
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStoma care and complications · Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments · Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas
Introduction
Parastomal hernias (PSH) are among the most challenging types of hernias to manage, both surgically and non-operatively. They commonly occur after stoma creation, with incidence rates reported as high as 50% within 2 years [1]. Even if a PSH is surgically repaired, approximately one in three patients will require reoperation for recurrence within 6 years [2].
Although surgical strategies have evolved significantly, the risk of recurrence is high. Therefore, non-surgical strategies—such as watchful waiting, stoma care, guided core training, and abdominal binders—are widely used to improve comfort and potentially slow progression, yet consensus remains lacking. Furthermore, comprehensive care should address psychological and social impacts of living with a PSH.
Stoma care and appliance management are central to the daily experiences of individuals with PSH. Herniation can distort the peristomal skin contour, complicating appliance fitting and increasing the risk of leakage, skin irritation, and dermatitis. Ripoche et al. reported that 28% of patients experienced leakage due to appliance-fitting issues, highlighting the importance of effective stoma management, as these complications can significantly impair quality of life and lead to social withdrawal [3].
This narrative review summarizes current non-operative approaches for the holistic management of PSH, emphasizing physical activity, abdominal support garments, and patient-centered care. It explores the role of guided core training, stoma care strategies, and patient education in enhancing quality of life. In addition to conservative strategies, the review also considers selected perioperative supportive measures—particularly the use of abdominal binders—as these overlap conceptually and remain clinically relevant. Furthermore, the review addresses psychosocial implications and underscores the importance of individualized, multidisciplinary management based on available evidence and clinical expertise.
Methods
This work was designed as a narrative review of the literature on non-operative strategies for the management of parastomal hernia (PSH). We performed electronic searches in PubMed and Google Scholar covering the period from 2011 to March 2025. The following keywords and combinations were used: “parastomal hernia,” “conservative management,” “non-operative treatment,” “support garment,” “abdominal binder,” “stoma care,” “core training,” “physical activity,” and “quality of life.”
Studies were limited to the English language. Reference lists of included articles were manually screened for additional relevant publications. In addition, domain experts were consulted to identify key publications that may not have been captured through database searches. Because this is a narrative rather than a systematic review, no formal quality assessment or meta-analysis was performed; instead, emphasis was placed on summarizing available evidence and identifying knowledge gaps.
Watchful Waiting
For patients with minimal symptoms, watchful waiting remains the common practice. Current evidence indicates that most PSH do not progress rapidly to severe complications, such as bowel obstruction or strangulation, allowing many patients to maintain good quality of life without surgical intervention for extended periods [1, 4].
Nevertheless, surgical outcomes highlight the trade-offs between elective and emergency repair. In a large cohort study of older adults, elective PSH repair was associated with a 40.2% complication rate, a 21.1% 5-year reoperation rate [5], and up to 35% recurrence rate [6].
However, emergency presentations, although infrequent, are associated with substantial complication rates of approximately 62% [7], and recurrence following acute repairs up to 38% [8].
Physical Activity
Evidence regarding physical activity in patients with a stoma remains limited and generally of low quality. Most studies focus on cancer survivors and emphasize basic functional outcomes, with scarce data on optimal exercise regimens or broader quality of life parameters [9].
Several stoma-related factors may restrict physical activity. For example, stoma prolapse often compromises appliance adhesion, while skin discomfort further discourages mobility and exercise [10]. Despite these barriers, maintaining physical activity is of course important.
Among patients who are not surgical candidates or choose conservative management, fear of worsening the hernia or causing complications often leads to a sedentary lifestyle. This fear is well-documented and associated with physical deconditioning and social withdrawal [11, 12]. However, emerging evidence suggests that light to moderate physical activity is not only safe but beneficial in preserving general health and quality of life [13].
In patients undergoing surgical repair—whether through local fascial approximation, mesh reinforcement, or stoma relocation—postoperative activity guidance is essential to support healing, reduce recurrence risk, and restore functional independence. Unlike groin or small ventral hernias, the abdominal wall surrounding the stoma is structurally compromised and subject to complex, multidirectional stressors that challenge rehabilitation and long-term recovery [14].
Patients are typically advised to avoid heavy lifting, core straining, or high-impact movements for 2–4 weeks, with a gradual return to full activity based on individual healing and clinical judgment [15].
Targeted education about safe lifting techniques, optimal posture, and core-friendly exercises significantly reduces patient anxiety and enhances recovery outcomes, proving cost-effective in practice [16, 17]. Multidisciplinary involvement, particularly the inclusion of physiotherapists and stoma care nurses, is beneficial, especially for patients with complex hernias, reduced baseline fitness, or psychological distress [18].
Abdominal Binders and Support Garments
The use of abdominal binders or support garments is more prevalent and clinically significant in patients with PSH than in those with other types of hernias [19]. These non-operative devices are relevant in two distinct contexts: conservative management for patients who are not surgical candidates, and perioperative supportive care following hernia repair.
Conservative Use
Support garments are commonly used as a conservative approach for symptom relief in patients managed without surgery. They are designed to provide targeted external compression around the stoma and hernia site, aiming to reduce protrusion, improve comfort, and enhance a sense of security during physical activity. Garments vary in form and compression level, with multiple types reported in the literature [19–21].
A recent scoping review found that binders are the most commonly recommended conservative treatment for PSH [21]. However, it is well-documented that many of them remain unused [19, 20, 22]. In a survey of 322 patients who had ordered a hernia belt, only 45% used it regularly, and just 27% believed it was the best way to manage their hernia [23]. Choosing the appropriate belt requires individualized assessment of patient expectations, symptoms, needs, and comorbidities [19, 20]. Practical testing of different belt types, access to tailored information, and follow-up were identified as key enablers of belt adherence in a qualitative Danish study [19].
Belt–appliance compatibility is crucial to avoid pressure ulcers, and in irreducible hernias, use should be cautious due to strangulation risk [21]. Well-fitted belts may relieve pain, bulging, leakage, and functional limitations, supporting activity and social participation. On the other hand, adverse effects include discomfort, restricted mobility, skin irritation, and ulcers [23–25].
Proper application technique is important: belts should ideally be applied while lying down with the hernia reduced, although this may be challenging for some patients [19, 21]. Given the complexity of selection and fitting, surgeons are encouraged to refer or re-refer patients with a PSH to a stoma care nurse for detailed assessment and patient education [19, 20].
Perioperative Supportive Care
In the postoperative phase, abdominal binders or support garments are often employed to protect the surgical repair site during the early healing, although this practice is supported mainly by evidence from incisional and ventral hernia repair literature, with limited data available for PSH. Several studies have suggested potential benefits of binder use, including reduced postoperative psychological distress [26], a lower incidence of surgical site infection [27], alleviation of pain [28–31] and enhanced mobilization [29–31].
However, evidence remains mixed. A patient survey following incisional hernia repair reported that although abdominal binders were frequently associated with reduced pain, approximately one-third of patients experienced decreased mobility. Notably, neither binder use nor prolonged physical rest appeared to significantly affect postoperative morbidity [32].
From randomized data of patients undergoing laparoscopic umbilical or epigastric hernia repair, binder use did not significantly influence postoperative pain or seroma formation, despite 86% of patients reporting subjective benefits [33]. A recent multicenter pilot trial involving laparoscopic IPOM for incisional hernia demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in early postoperative pain with binder use, although outcomes related to seroma formation and mobility remained unaffected [34].
Thus, although binders may not decrease risk of surgical complications there is indications that they improve patients’ satisfaction which is considered a core outcome in non-malignant surgery, including ventral hernia repair [22]. In clinical practice, therefore many healthcare providers recommend that patients wear support garments during upright activities for an extended period postoperatively—typically between 6 and 12 weeks, though some may continue for up to one year—due to the absence of standardized duration guidelines [35, 36].
Education and Fitting
Education on garment use is essential in both the conservative and perioperative settings. Patients should ideally be assessed and fitted by a trained stoma care nurse or clinical specialist, in line with the recommendations of the Canadian best practice (2024) and recent rapid review [37]. Instruction should address garment selection, correct fitting, timing and duration of wear, early recognition of issues such as excessive pressure or discomfort, and practical integration into daily activities including work, exercise, and social participation [17, 38, 39].
Psychosocial Impact and Quality of Life
PSH present a distinct array of challenges that extend beyond the visible protrusion at the stoma site. These include stoma-related complications, cosmetic and negative body image issues, psychological distress, and functional limitations [19]—all of which require individualized, multidisciplinary care.
The psychosocial impact of PSH is profound yet often under-recognized. Patients frequently report anxiety, shame, and concerns about body image related to visible bulging or the potential for appliance leakage [40]. In one study using the Body Image Questionnaire, patients with PSH expressed significantly greater levels of distress and embarrassment [41]. These issues are particularly prominent among younger or working-age individuals and those returning to physically demanding roles. Reports suggest that up to 35% of individuals with PSH experience social limitations as a result of their condition [42].
Quality of life assessments and symptom scores—such as the Colostomy Impact Score or Hernia-Related Quality of Life (HerQLes) questionnaire—can serve as helpful tools to identify patients whose symptoms interfere with daily life [43], even in the absence of overt complications. In addition, surgical outcomes are not a convincing measure on their own; treatment of ostomy patients should be directed towards improving quality of life [44].
Discussion
Despite advancements in surgical techniques, non-operative management remains essential, particularly for patients with minimal to moderate symptoms or significant comorbidities [4]. The current narrative review highlights that a holistic approach—integrating watchful waiting, physical activity, abdominal support garments, and multidisciplinary care—constitutes a cornerstone of effective PSH management and a doable alternative to surgery (Table 1). However, even in patients undergoing surgical repair, many of these approaches can most probably be of benefit both before and after operation.
Watchful waiting is widely accepted as a reasonable initial strategy for patients with minimal or no symptoms, based on current evidence suggesting slow progression and minimal immediate risk of severe complications. This is also emphasized by the high recurrence rates after surgical repair, typically in the range of 21%–40% [2, 5–8].
Physical activity constitutes an essential yet under-investigated aspect of non-operative PSH management. Despite limited direct evidence for PSH, cautious extrapolation from ventral and incisional hernia literature suggests that targeted physical activity—guided by safety principles and gradual progression—can support recovery and reduce recurrence risk. Patient counseling should emphasize the high recurrence rates post-surgical intervention, reinforcing long-term strategies for core protection and activity modification [1]. Where available, physiotherapists and stoma care nurses collaborate in providing tailored rehabilitation programs, guiding patients through early-stage recovery, gentle strength-building, and confidence-boosting mobility routines. Nonetheless, robust evidence remains scarce, underscoring a clear need for more dedicated research into structured physiotherapy and rehabilitation protocols tailored explicitly to PSH.
The use of abdominal binders or support garments presents another critical aspect of non-operative PSH management, relevant both conservatively and perioperatively. Conservative use aims primarily at symptom relief and improved comfort during daily and physical activity, yet selection and adherence challenges persist. There is currently no evidence that wearing a belt affects the progression of a parastomal bulge over time, nor regarding optimal wear duration, compression level, or whether the belt should have a hole for the stoma [21]. Caution is particularly advised for non-reducible hernias due to pressure-related complications.
Although tapering strategies have not been formally studied, the limited duration of demonstrated benefits—such as reduced pain and reduced infection risk early after repair—suggests that gradual tapering of binder use may be reasonable as healing progresses, helping to minimise dependency. This approach is particularly important given individual variations in stoma location, mesh placement, and postoperative abdominal contour.
Beyond physical support, effective appliance management and stoma care, facilitated by skilled stoma nurses, significantly influence daily experiences and quality of life for individuals with PSH. Appliance modifications—including convex wafers, barrier rings, or custom-fitted pouches—are essential to mitigate complications such as leakage, skin irritation, and dermatitis, which significantly impair quality of life [3, 20].
Although the psychosocial impact of PSH is increasingly acknowledged, it remains inadequately addressed in clinical guidelines, which predominantly focus on surgical outcomes [41]. Patients frequently experience anxiety, embarrassment, and social withdrawal due to visible bulging and leakage fears. Proactive, empathetic clinical consultations addressing emotional responses, offering psychological support, and utilizing validated quality of life assessments are important. These tools not only aid in clinical decision-making but also help track non-operative management effectiveness.
Finally, elective repair should be carefully considered in light of recurrence rates that are comparable to emergency repairs [5–7]. Active watchful waiting, incorporating patient education, lifestyle measures, and regular follow-up, can help avoid urgent interventions while optimizing overall patient wellbeing.
Limitations
It is noteworthy that most available evidence on non-operative strategies stems from incisional hernia repairs, which differ anatomically and biomechanically from PSH. As such, direct extrapolation should be approached with caution until PSH-specific trials are conducted. Management decisions must account for heterogeneity in hernia morphology and patient presentation. The European Hernia Society classification, which stratifies PSH by defect size (using 5 cm as a threshold) and the presence of a concomitant incisional hernia, offers a clinically relevant framework for individualized assessment [44]. While overlapping features between large PSH and incisional hernias may justify applying insights from ventral hernia literature in selected cases, further clinical research tailored to PSH is essential.
Conclusion
Non-operative strategies for PSH management represent a critical component of personalized care and offer meaningful symptom relief, promote patient autonomy, and support quality of life, particularly for individuals not suited for immediate surgical intervention. However, standardized protocols and high-quality, PSH-specific research are clearly needed. Until then a holistic, multidisciplinary approach and collaboration is considered vital for optimal outcomes.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Antoniou SA Agresta F Garcia Alamino JM Berger D Berrevoet F Brandsma HT European Hernia Society Guidelines on Prevention and Treatment of Parastomal Hernias. Hernia (2018) 22(1):183–98. 10.1007/s 10029-017-1697-5 29134456 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Henriksen NA Helgstrand F. Prospective Nationwide Analysis of Long-Term Recurrence Rates After Elective Ventral, Incisional and Parastomal Hernia Repairs. BJS Open (2024) 8(4):zrae 070. 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae 070 38959298 PMC 11221424 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Ripoche J Basurko C Fabbro-Perray P Prudhomme M. Parastomal Hernia: A Study of the French Federation of Ostomy Patients. J Visc Surg (2011) 148(6):e 435–e 441. 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2011.10.006 22130074 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Kroese LF Lambrichts DPV Jeekel J Kleinrensink GJ Menon AG De Graaf EJR Non-Operative Treatment as A Strategy for Patients With Parastomal Hernia: A Multicentre, Retrospective Cohort Study. Colorectal Dis (2018) 20(6):545–51. 10.1111/codi.13962 29150969 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 5Howard R Rob F Thumma J Ehlers AO’Neill S Dimick JB Contemporary Outcomes of Elective Parastomal Hernia Repair in Older Adults. JAMA Surg (2023) 158(4):394–402. 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.7978 36790773 PMC 9932944 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6Mäkäräinen-Uhlbäck E Vironen J Falenius V Nordström PVälikoski AKössi J Parastomal Hernia: A Retrospective Nationwide Cohort Study Comparing Different Techniques With Long-Term Follow-Up. World J Surg (2021) 45(6):1742–9. 10.1007/s 00268-021-05990-z 33560501 PMC 8093171 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 7Baxter NB Pediyakkal HF De Shazor-Burnett LJ Speyer CB Richburg CE Howard RA Outcomes of Emergency Parastomal Hernia Repair in Older Adults: A Retrospective Analysis. J Surg Res (2024) 293:596–606. 10.1016/j.jss.2023.09.061 37837814 PMC 11497855 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8Ramli R Ng ZQ Diab J Gilmore A. Acute Parastomal Hernia Presentations: A 10-Year Review of Management and Outcomes. J Abdom Wall Surg (2024) 3:13364. 10.3389/jaws.2024.13364 39669895 PMC 11634599 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
