# Serological Response to COVID-19 Vaccination in Saudi Arabia: A Comparative Study of IgG and Neutralising Antibodies Across Vaccine Platforms

**Authors:** Mariam M. AlEissa, Ahdab A. Alsaieedi, Reema Alduaiji, Fahad Almsned, Yousif AlDossary, Nada Saleh, Raghad A. AlQurashi, Esraa A. Hawsa, Muath b Ben Shaded, Amer M. Alshehri, Osamah T. Khojah, Eyad Y. Abu Sarhan, Hamad H. Alonazi, Walid A. Nouh, Khalid H. AlAnazi, Sami S. Almudrra, Khaled I. AlAbdulkareem, Abdullah AlJurayyan, Abdullah M. Asiri

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/vaccines13101042 · Vaccines · 2025-10-10

## TL;DR

This study compares how well different COVID-19 vaccines boost antibody levels in Saudi Arabia, finding mRNA vaccines like Pfizer and Moderna are most effective.

## Contribution

The study provides region-specific real-world data on vaccine immunogenicity in Saudi Arabia, including insights into heterologous vaccination schedules.

## Key findings

- Pfizer and Moderna vaccines induced stronger antibody responses compared to AstraZeneca.
- Heterologous vaccine schedules showed comparable or enhanced immunogenicity compared to homologous schedules.
- High prior SARS-CoV-2 exposure was indicated by 75.4% IgG positivity at baseline.

## Abstract

Background: In the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, various COVID-19 vaccines were administered during the pandemic. However, region-specific real-word comparative data on their immunogenicity remain limited. This study aimed to assess the serological responses to Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2), Moderna (mRNA-1273), and AstraZeneca (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) vaccines in a diverse population living in KSA. Methods: This observational study included 236 adults recruited from vaccination sites in Riyadh. Participants provided serum samples at predefined intervals: before the first dose, after the first dose, after the second dose, and post-vaccination infection (if applicable). IgG and neutralising antibodies were quantified using ELISA assays. Demographic and vaccination data, and their associations with antibody responses, were evaluated. Results: At baseline, 75.4% of participants were positive for SARS-CoV-2 IgG, suggesting high prior exposure. Marked incremental increases in IgG levels were observed after each vaccine dose. Both Moderna and Pfizer elicited stronger responses, with Pfizer inducing the strongest early response and Moderna achieving the highest overall titres. Among IgG-positive individuals, neutralising antibodies were detected in 98.1%. There were no statistically significant differences by age or gender, although males tended to show higher mean titres. Heterologous vaccine schedules induced comparable or enhanced immunogenicity relative to homologous schedules, supporting their use in flexible immunisation strategies. Conclusions: All COVID-19 vaccines administered in Saudi Arabia elicited robust antibody responses, particularly the mRNA-based vaccines. Our findings support their continued use and justify varied vaccination approaches, including mix-and-match booster strategies, to enhance community immunity.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** SARS-CoV-2 (MONDO:0100096), COVID-19 (MONDO:0100096)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** infection (MESH:D007239), COVID-19 (MESH:D000086382)
- **Species:** Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (no rank) [taxon 2697049]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12568187/full.md

## Figures

8 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12568187/full.md

## References

32 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12568187/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12568187