# Wearable EEG Sensor Analysis for Cognitive Profiling in Educational Contexts

**Authors:** Eleni Lekati, Georgios N. Dimitrakopoulos, Konstantinos Lazaros, Panagiota Giannopoulou, Aristidis G. Vrahatis, Marios G. Krokidis, Panagiotis Vlamos, Spyridon Doukakis

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/s25206446 · Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025-10-18

## TL;DR

This study uses wearable EEG to identify cognitive profiles of students learning fractions, revealing neural patterns that could help tailor educational strategies.

## Contribution

The study introduces a novel approach to cognitive profiling in education using real-time EEG data and identifies distinct learner profiles linked to neurocognitive markers.

## Key findings

- Lower-performing students showed elevated delta and theta power under cognitive load.
- Higher-performing students exhibited stable beta activity linked to cognitive control.
- EEG features like gamma and beta oscillations reliably distinguished three learner profiles.

## Abstract

Electroencephalography (EEG) provides a powerful means of capturing real-time neural activity, enabling the study of cognitive processes during complex learning tasks. This study explores the application of wearable EEG and advanced signal analysis to examine cognitive profiles of 30 sixth-grade students engaged in fraction learning. Using validated estimations alongside interactive digital tools such as Fraction Lab and the Diamond Paper task, EEG recordings were processed to evaluate spectral dynamics across delta, theta, alpha, and beta bands. Results revealed that lower-performing students exhibited elevated delta and theta power under cognitive load, whereas higher-performing students showed more stable beta activity linked to cognitive control. These findings highlight the utility of EEG-based signal analysis for identifying neurocognitive markers associated with conceptual and procedural knowledge (PK) in mathematics. The integration of such methodologies supports the development of precision-oriented educational strategies grounded in objective neural data. Clustering further revealed three learner profiles: Core Support Needed, Developing, and Advanced, while classification analyses confirmed that EEG features, especially gamma and beta oscillations, reliably distinguished among them, underscoring the potential of neurocognitive markers to guide adaptive instruction.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** ASD (MESH:D001321), learning difficulties (MESH:D007859), injury to (MESH:D014947), cognitive fatigue (MESH:D005221), PK (MESH:D000073818), confusion (MESH:D003221)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12568116/full.md

## Figures

11 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12568116/full.md

## References

72 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12568116/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12568116