# Integrated Investigation Approach for Solid Waste Landfill Hazards—A Case Study of Two Decommissioned Industrial Sites

## TL;DR

This study introduces a new method to efficiently locate and measure solid waste in old industrial landfills using geophysical surveys and drilling.

## Contribution

The novel integrated approach combines geophysical methods and drilling to reduce costs and improve accuracy in landfill characterization.

## Key findings

- Geophysical surveys identified waste zones with irregular thicknesses and differentiated them from other subsurface features.
- Drilling confirmed solid waste at nine locations, validating the geophysical data.
- The integrated method reduced field effort by 35% and quantified total waste volume as 266.9 m³.

## Abstract

Historical chemical production sites often harbor irregularly distributed solid waste landfills, posing significant environmental risks. Traditional drilling methods, while accurate, are inefficient for comprehensive characterization due to high costs and spatial limitations. This study aims to develop an integrated geophysical drilling approach to accurately delineate the spatial distribution and volume of landfilled solid waste (predominantly organic pollutants) at two decommissioned chemical plant sites (total area: 8954 m2). Methods: We combined (1) geophysical surveys (transient electromagnetic (TEM, 50 profiles, 2936 points), high-density resistivity (HDR, 2 profiles, 192 points), and ground-penetrating radar (GPR, 22 profiles, 1072.1 m)) and (2) systematic drilling verification (136 boreholes, ≤10 m × 10 m density). Anomalies were interpreted through integrating geophysical responses, historical records, and borehole validation. Spatial modeling was conducted using Kriging interpolation in EVS software. The results show that (1) the anomalies exhibited a “sparse multi-point distribution” across zones A2 (primary waste concentration), A4, and A6, which were differentiated into solid waste, foundations, contaminated soil, voids, and cracks; (2) drilling confirmed solid waste at nine locations (A2: “multi-point, small-quantity” residues; A6: contaminated clay layers with garbage) with irregular thicknesses (0.2–1.3 m); (3) TEM identified diagnostic medium–high-resistivity anomalies (e.g., 28–37 m in A4L3), while GPR detected 17 shallow anomalies (only one validated as waste); and (4) the total waste volume was quantified as 266.9 m3. The methodology reduced the field effort by ∼35% versus drilling-only approaches, resolved geophysical limitations (e.g., HDR’s volume effect overestimating the thickness), and provided a validated framework for efficient characterization of complex historical landfills.