# Assessing the Feasibility of an Intensified Extended Contact Survey (IECS) Compared to Passive Household Screening for Leprosy in Bangladesh

**Authors:** Kazi Naher, Mahfuza Rifat, Dipak Kumar Biswas, Sheikh Mohammad Faisal, Nimer Ortuño-Gutiérrez, Epco Hasker

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/tropicalmed10100274 · Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease · 2025-09-24

## TL;DR

This study compares active and passive leprosy case detection methods in Bangladesh, finding that active screening in high-risk areas identified more cases but did not significantly reduce disabilities.

## Contribution

The study introduces an intensified extended contact survey using geospatial tools to improve leprosy case detection in Bangladesh.

## Key findings

- Active screening in a 75-m buffer identified 0.7‰ new leprosy cases among neighbor contacts.
- Eight spatial clusters were identified, with three being significant from 2022 to 2023.
- The intervention did not significantly reduce grade 2 disabilities compared to the control arm.

## Abstract

Bangladesh is among the 23 WHO priority countries for leprosy, with a new case detection rate of 21 per million population including children among new cases indicating recent transmission. We aimed to compare active versus passive case detection using geospatial tools. A cluster-randomized study was conducted across seven intervention and seven control districts. In the intervention arm, GPS coordinates of new cases were recorded, and contacts within a 75-m buffer were screened. Spatial cluster analysis using Kulldorff’s scan statistics was performed to identify hotspots. The main objective was to achieve early case detection in intervention areas, reflected in a lower proportion of new patients with grade 2 disabilities (G2Ds). A total of 347/382 (90%) index cases were enrolled in the intervention arm, compared to 380/462 (82%) in the control arm. Among household contacts, 7/1482 (5‰) new cases were found in the intervention area and 12/1565 (7.7‰) in the control area. Additionally, 18/25,720 (0.7‰) new cases were detected among neighbor contacts in the intervention arm. G2D proportions were not lower in the intervention arm (15%) than in the comparator arm (11%, p = 0.043). Comparable household contact cases were observed in both arms, with more cases emerging among neighbors in intervention districts. Eight spatial clusters were identified, including 288/844 (34%) index cases, with three significant clusters from 2022 to 2023. Screening within a 75-m buffer detected additional leprosy cases, though fewer than expected due to COVID-19 limitations. Targeting clusters for case detection and prophylaxis could strengthen transmission control efforts.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** leprosy (MONDO:0005124)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** Leprosy (MESH:D007918), COVID-19 (MESH:D000086382)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12567758/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12567758/full.md

## References

18 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12567758/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12567758