# Gut Microbiota α- and β-Diversity, but Not Dietary Patterns, Differ Between Underweight and Normal-Weight Japanese Women Aged 20–39 Years

**Authors:** Risako Yamamoto-Wada, Eri Hiraiwa, Kana Okuma, Masako Yamada, Chihiro Ushiroda, Kanako Deguchi, Hiroyuki Naruse, Hiroaki Masuyama, Katsumi Iizuka

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/nu17203265 · Nutrients · 2025-10-17

## TL;DR

Underweight young Japanese women have less diverse gut microbes and specific bacterial changes compared to normal-weight women, unrelated to diet.

## Contribution

The study identifies gut microbiota diversity differences in underweight women, independent of dietary patterns, suggesting potential probiotic interventions.

## Key findings

- Underweight women had significantly lower gut microbiota α-diversity compared to normal-weight controls.
- Gut microbiota β-diversity differed significantly between underweight and normal-weight women.
- Specific bacterial genera like Bacteroides and Bifidobacterium were enriched in underweight women.

## Abstract

Background and Aim: Underweight young adult women are vulnerable to health risks such as menstrual disorders and vitamin deficiencies. Because few seek medical care for low body weight, the underlying causes remain unclear. This study aimed to examine the associations of body type with dietary patterns and gut microbiota diversity in young women. Methods: We enrolled 40 women aged 20–39 years who visited a nutrition evaluation clinic with a BMI < 17.5 at their first consultation (underweight group) and 40 age-matched women with 18.5 ≤ BMI < 25 (control group). Some women in the underweight group were no longer underweight at the time of analysis but were classified based on their initial BMI. Dietary patterns were assessed based on ten major food categories (meat, fish, eggs, dairy products, soybeans, green and yellow vegetables, seaweed, fruit, tubers, and fats and oil) based on the Food Frequency Questionnaire based on Food Groups. Gut microbiota α-diversity was evaluated using the Shannon, Simpson, and Pielou indices, while β-diversity was analyzed by nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) and redundancy analysis (RDA). Genera contributing to group differences were identified by RDA and ANOVA-Like Differential Expression tool (ALDEx2). Results: Underweight women had significantly lower gut microbiota α-diversity, while no difference was observed in dietary patterns. NMDS revealed significant β-diversity differences in gut microbiota (PERMANOVA: R2 = 0.064, F = 5.31, p = 0.0001) but not in dietary patterns (p = 0.99). RDA showed that body type explained 4.5% of variance (adjusted R2 = 0.032, F = 3.65, p = 0.0005). Bacteroides, Bifidobacterium, Enterocloster, and Erysipelatoclostridium were enriched in underweight women, whereas Fusicatenibacter, Agathobacter, Dorea, and Prevotella were enriched in controls. AldEx2 confirmed increases in Bacteroides, Enterocloster, and Erysipelatoclostridium and a decrease in Dorea. Conclusions: Underweight women demonstrated reduced gut microbiota diversity and enrichment of taxa associated with inflammatory tendencies. Dietary therapies involving not only prebiotics but also probiotics may beneficially modulate gut microbiota and contribute to the management of low body weight.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** vitamin deficiencies (MONDO:0024298)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** Underweight (MESH:D013851), vitamin deficiencies (MESH:D014802), inflammatory (MESH:D007249), menstrual disorders (MESH:D004412)
- **Species:** Bifidobacterium (genus) [taxon 1678], Fusicatenibacter (genus) [taxon 1407607], Prevotella (genus) [taxon 838], Dorea (genus) [taxon 189330], Agathobacter (genus) [taxon 1766253], Bacteroides (genus) [taxon 816], Glycine max (soybean, species) [taxon 3847], Erysipelatoclostridium [taxon 1505663], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12567037/full.md

## Figures

5 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12567037/full.md

## References

57 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12567037/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12567037