Correction: Onodera et al. Prognostic Factors and Talaporfin Sodium Concentration in Photodynamic Therapy for Recurrent Grade 4 Glioma. Pharmaceuticals 2025, 18, 583
Mikoto Onodera, Shuji Kitahara, Yasuto Sato, Takakazu Kawamata, Yoshihiro Muragaki, Ken Masamune

Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
| Newly Diagnosed | Recurrence | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hazard Ratio (95% CI) | Hazard Ratio (95% CI) | Hazard Ratio (95% CI) | Hazard Ratio (95% CI) | |||||
| Age | 1.02 (0.99–1.04) | 0.26 | 1.02 (0.99–1.05) | 0.27 | 1.01 (0.99–1.03) | 0.22 | 2.03 (0.81–5.93) | 0.50 |
| Male vs. female sex | 1.35 (0.62–2.94) | 0.44 | 1.08 (0.62–1.88) | 0.45 | ||||
| KPS | 0.98 (0.95–1.00) | 0.097 | 0.96 (0.93–0.99) | 0.01 | 0.09 (0.02–0.33) | 0.0003 | 0.96 (0.95–0.99) | 0.0008 |
| Alb | 1.51 (0.51–4.48) | 0.45 | 3.68 (1.05–13.76) | 0.047 | 2.22 (0.88–5.84) | 0.090 | 2.13 (0.81–5.93) | 0.13 |
| Total cholesterol | 1.00 (0.98–1.01) | 0.59 | 1.00 (0.99–1.01) | 0.40 | ||||
| Benzodiazepine | 2.36 (0.81–6.88) | 0.15 | 3.06 (0.96–9.76) | 0.059 | 0.77 (0.34–1.72) | 0.52 | 0.77 (0.34–1.74) | 0.52 |
| Smoking | 1.57 (0.70–3.53) | 0.29 | 1.58 (0.67–3.73) | 0.3 | 1.07 (0.64–1.79) | 0.80 | 1.21 (0.67–2.19) | 0.53 |
| Localization | ||||||||
| Temporal vs. not temporal | 0.50 (0.22–1.11) | 0.079 | 1.00 (0.56–1.78) | 0.99 | ||||
| Frontal vs. not frontal | 1.14 (0.51–2.56) | 0.75 | 0.72 (0.43–1.20) | 0.20 | ||||
| Parietal vs. not parietal | 1.32 (0.53–3.31) | 0.56 | 1.36 (0.72–2.53) | 0.35 | ||||
| Newly Diagnosed | Recurrence | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean TS Concentration | Mean TS Concentration | Mean TS Concentration | Mean TS Concentration | |||
| Male vs. female | 13 (31.7%)/8 (19.5%) | 13 (31.7%)/7 (17.1%) | 0.837 | 13 (31.7%)/8 (19.5%) | 14 (34.2%)/6 (14.6%) | 0.5843 |
| Age, mean ± SD | 60.7 ± 12.2 | 61.3 ± 11.9 | 0.884 | 47.6 ± 14.2 | 53.6 ± 10.5 | 0.5843 |
| Left vs. right (excluded bilateral case) | 11 (31.4%)/7 (20.0%) | 6 (17.1%)/11 (31.4%) | 0.1245 | 10 (26.3%)/9 (23.7%) | 6 (15.8%)/13 (34.2%) | 0.1869 |
| Pathological diagnosis | ||||||
| Mean MIB-1 ± SD | 28.9 ± 11.9 | 22.1 ± 11.5 | 0.0607 | 21.3 ± 15.4 | 22.0 ± 15.5 | 0.8886 |
| ATRX intact vs. loss | 20 (51.2%)/0 (0%) | 18 (46.2%)/1 (2.6%) | 0.226 | 12 (30.8%)/7 (18.0%) | 16 (39.0%)/4 (9.7%) | 0.2407 |
| P53 (+) vs. (−) | 4 (9.76%)/17 (41.5%) | 6 (14.6%)/14 (34.2%) | 0.4134 | 6 (15.0%)/14 (35.0%) | 7 (17.0%)/13 (31.7%) | 0.7356 |
| IDH (+) vs. (−) | 0 (0%)/21 (51.2%) | 1 (2.4%)/19 (46.3%) | 0.226 | 5 (12.5%)/15 (37.5%) | 4 (9.7%)/16 (39.0%) | 0.7047 |
| Part | ||||||
| Temporal vs. not temporal | 7 (17.1%)/14 (34.2%) | 9 (22.0%)/11 (26.8%) | 0.4435 | 8 (19.5%)/13 (31.7%) | 5 (12.2%)/15 (36.6%) | 0.366 |
| Frontal vs. not frontal | 11 (26.8%)/10 (24.4%) | 8 (19.5%)/12 (29.3%) | 0.4261 | 7 (17.1%)/14 (34.2%) | 8 (19.5%)/12 (29.3%) | 0.6577 |
| Parietal vs. not parietal | 2 (4.9%)/19 (46.3%) | 2 (4.9%)/18 (43.9%) | 0.959 | 5 (12.2%)/16 (39.0%) | 5 (12.2%)/15 (36.6%) | 0.9293 |
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNanoplatforms for cancer theranostics · Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies · Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Error in Table
In the original publication [1], there were mistakes in a part of Table 2, Section 2.5, and the label of Table 3. In Table 2, errors present in the data shown under “Recurrence” were identical to those under “Newly Diagnosed”. The corrected Table 2 appears below.
The values in Section 2.5 of the text did not match those in Table 3. We have replaced the first paragraph in Section 2.5 with the paragraph below, in which the numerical values have been corrected, as shown in Table 3. In addition, the label of the right-hand group in Table 3 was incorrect; the correct label is “Recurrence.” The corrected Table 3 appears below. The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.
2.5. Analysis of Clinical Factors in the High vs. Low Intratumoral TS Concentration Groups
Among the 82 patients for whom intratumoral TS concentration was measured, the newly diagnosed group consisted of 41 patients (high concentration, 51.2%; low concentration, 48.8%) with a mean age of 60.7 years (SD: 12.2 years) and 61.3 years (SD: 11.9 years), respectively.
Similarly, the recurrent group included 41 patients (high concentration, 51.2%; low concentration, 48.8%) with a mean age of 47.6 years (SD: 14.2 years) and 53.6 years (SD: 10.5 years), respectively.
No significant differences in age or sex were observed between the high- and low-concentration groups (age, Newly Diagnosed p = 0.884 and Recurrence p = 0.5843, and sex, Newly Diagnosed p = 0.837 and Recurrence p = 0.5843, respectively). Additionally, no significant differences were found in tumor location, genetic mutations, benzodiazepine use, or smoking history, suggesting that no specific factors were associated with TS concentrations (Table 3).
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
