# Early Initiation of Biologic Therapies to Prevent Severe Asthma Progression

## TL;DR

This paper argues for starting biologic treatments earlier in asthma patients to prevent progression to severe disease.

## Contribution

The paper proposes a shift from severity-based to risk-based treatment strategies for asthma using biomarkers.

## Key findings

- Early biologic therapy may prevent severe asthma progression.
- Biomarkers like eosinophil count and FeNO can guide early treatment decisions.
- Current guidelines delay biologic therapy until late disease stages.

## Abstract

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease with a heterogeneous course, often progressing silently from mild symptoms to severe, treatment-refractory disease. Current guidelines recommend biologic therapies after failure of high-dose inhaled corticosteroids and additional controllers, typically in patients with frequent exacerbations. This reactive approach may delay intervention until irreversible airway remodeling has occurred, limiting the potential benefits of biologic therapy. Therefore, severe asthma may be envisioned as the consequence of missed opportunities for early interventions. Early initiation of biologic therapy—guided by biomarkers such as blood eosinophil count and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), as well as symptom burden and risk of lung function decline—may prevent progression to severe asthma and improve remission rates. This position paper advocates for a shift from severity-based to risk-based treatment strategies, recommending earlier biomarker assessment, redefinition of escalation criteria, and clinical trials designed to evaluate biologics in symptomatic non-exacerbating patients. By recognizing persistent inflammation and progression risk earlier in the disease course, clinicians may have a critical opportunity to alter the trajectory of asthma, reduce long-term morbidity, and achieve sustained control before irreversible damage occurs.