# Effect of CMT and MIG Welding on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Al-Zn-Mg-Cu-Er-Zr Alloy

## TL;DR

This study compares how two welding methods affect the structure and strength of a new aluminum alloy, finding that CMT welding produces better results.

## Contribution

The study provides a detailed comparison of CMT and MIG welding effects on a novel Al-Zn-Mg-Cu-Er-Zr alloy's microstructure and mechanical properties.

## Key findings

- CMT welding produces finer grains and a smaller heat-affected zone compared to MIG welding.
- CMT welding results in higher hardness and tensile strength in the weld zones.
- Both methods produce coarse cellular grain structures with similar secondary phase precipitates.

## Abstract

Cold metal transfer (CMT) welding and metal inert gas (MIG) arc welding of a novel Al-Zn-Mg-Cu-Er-Zr alloy are systematically analyzed. The effect of the two welding processes on the morphology, microstructure, and mechanical properties of welded joints was investigated. The evolution of the microstructures and grain structures in the welded joints is studied using an optical microscope (OM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) with energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS). The results show that both welding methods obtain well-formed full-penetration welds, and the width of the heat-affected zone (HAZ) of CMT welding is smaller than that of MIG welding. The two welded joints reveal coarse cellular grain structures with precipitates of η (MgZn2), Al3Er, and S (Al6CuMg4) secondary phases. The average grain size of the weld metal in the cold metal transfer welding (12.96 μm) joint is much finer than that of the metal inert gas arc welding joint (22.63 μm), with a higher proportion of high-angle grain boundaries (HAGBs). The hardness of cold metal transfer welding and metal inert gas arc welding weld zones is 103.9 HV and 92.6 HV, respectively, and the tensile strength of the joint is 334.0 MPa and 270.3 MPa, respectively.