# Oculomotor Behavior of L2 Readers with Typologically Distant L1 Background: The “Big Three” Effects of Word Length, Frequency, and Predictability

## TL;DR

This study explores how Chinese speakers learning Russian process text, focusing on word length, frequency, and predictability effects on eye movements.

## Contribution

The study reveals how typologically distant L1/L2 pairs process the 'big three' reading factors differently, particularly in late stages of comprehension.

## Key findings

- Word frequency in L2 reading affects both early and late processing stages, unlike in L1 reading.
- Predictability influences skipping rates in L1 but only late measures in L2 reading.
- Word length interacts with L2 exposure, showing adaptation to new script and word structure.

## Abstract

Oculomotor reading behavior is influenced by both universal factors, like the “big three” of word length, frequency, and contextual predictability, and language-specific factors, such as script and grammar. The aim of this study was to examine the influence of the “big three” factors on L2 reading focusing on a typologically distant L1/L2 pair with dramatic differences in script and grammar. A total of 41 native Chinese-speaking learners of Russian (levels A2-B2) and 40 native Russian speakers read a corpus of 90 Russian sentences for comprehension. Their eye movements were recorded with EyeLink 1000+. We analyzed both early (gaze duration and skipping rate) and late (regression rate and rereading time) eye movement measures. As expected, the “big three” effects influenced oculomotor behavior in both L1 and L2 readers, being more pronounced for L2, but substantial differences were also revealed. Word frequency in L1 reading primarily influenced early processing stages, whereas in L2 reading it remained significant in later stages as well. Predictability had an immediate effect on skipping rates in L1 reading, while L2 readers only exhibited it in late measures. Word length was the only factor that interacted with L2 language exposure which demonstrated adjustment to alphabetic script and polymorphemic word structure. Our findings provide new insights into the processing challenges of L2 readers with typologically distant L1 backgrounds.