# Radicular Pathology in Zirconia and Stainless-Steel Crowns in Primary Posterior Teeth: A Retrospective Comparative Longitudinal Study

**Authors:** Diana Ram, Maayan Sherman, David Polak, Esti Davidovich

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/children12101417 · Children · 2025-10-20

## TL;DR

This study compares zirconia and stainless steel crowns in children's teeth, finding that stainless steel crowns are more durable and less likely to cause root issues.

## Contribution

The study provides longitudinal evidence on the clinical performance of zirconia versus stainless steel crowns in primary molars.

## Key findings

- Zirconia crowns had higher rates of radicular pathology (18%) compared to stainless steel crowns (9%).
- Stainless steel crowns showed longer survival and later onset of pathology than zirconia crowns.
- Both crown types had high overall success rates (87%), but zirconia had more retention loss.

## Abstract

Background: Zirconia crowns (ZCs) are increasingly used in pediatric dentistry for their esthetic advantages, but evidence regarding their long-term outcomes compared with stainless steel crowns (SSCs) is limited. Methods: This retrospective cohort study evaluated 138 primary molars in 89 children (mean age: 5.1 ± 1.6 years) restored with ZCs (n = 69) or SSCs (n = 69). Radiographic and clinical follow-up averaged 27.7 months. Outcomes included radicular pathology, crown retention, and survival. Statistical analyses examined associations with patient age, tooth type, and pulp therapy. Results: Both groups demonstrated high overall success (87%). However, pathology developed more frequently in ZCs compared with SSCs (18% vs. 9%, p = 0.0025). Loss of retention was also higher in ZCs (16% vs. 3%, p = 0.009). No significant associations were found between pathology and patient age, tooth type, or pulp therapy. SSCs demonstrated longer survival (29.1 vs. 25.1 months, p = 0.034) and later onset of pathology (29.1 vs. 12.5 months, p = 0.003). Crowns offer an esthetic alternative for restoring primary molars but are associated with higher rates of radicular pathology and retention loss. Careful case selection, optimal isolation, and appropriate cementation are essential for clinical success. Stainless steel crowns remain the more durable option, particularly in complex clinical cases.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** retention (MESH:D016055), Stainless-Steel Crowns (MESH:D013494)
- **Chemicals:** Zirconia (MESH:C028541)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12564867/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12564867/full.md

## References

19 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12564867/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12564867