# Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy in a Tertiary Hospital in France: A Description of Service Models and Costs

**Authors:** Espérie Burnet, Alicia Le Bras, Guillaume Roucoux, Christian Dupont, Etienne Canouï, Clément Leclaire, Jérémie Zerbit, Pierre Régis Burgel, Clémence Martin, Isabelle Durand-Zaleski, Martin Duracinsky

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics14100971 · Antibiotics · 2025-09-26

## TL;DR

This study explores different models and costs of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy in a French hospital.

## Contribution

The study identifies five distinct OPAT coordination models and their associated costs in a single hospital setting.

## Key findings

- Five OPAT coordination and monitoring models were identified, with varying numbers of OPAT episodes per year.
- Weekly costs for OPAT models ranged from EUR 1445 to EUR 2308 under a standardized clinical scenario.
- Only one model included a nurse specialist for coordination and monitoring, handling 450 OPATs annually.

## Abstract

Background/Objectives: Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) has been implemented throughout the world for the treatment of most infections. Published studies have focused on OPAT delivery, with limited data on coordination and monitoring practices. Methods: A mixed methods study, using an exploratory sequential design, was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Paris, France. Ten semi-structured interviews were conducted with prescribing physicians and professionals involved in OPAT coordination and monitoring. A general inductive approach was used to analyze verbatim data and build a framework for OPAT model characterization. Cost estimates, using a standardized scenario, were applied to each model. Results: Five OPAT coordination and monitoring models were identified. All OPATs were administered by visiting nurses in the patient’s home. Referral to an infectious disease physician was not systematic, and three models, with 3 to 50 OPAT episodes/year each, outsourced hospital-to-home coordination and monitoring to external medical service and device providers. Only one OPAT model, with 450 OPATs annually, included a nurse specialist within the unit to coordinate and monitor treatment. Clinically and/or socially vulnerable patients received OPAT through hospital at home services, which reported 30 OPATs/year. Under the standardized clinical scenario applied to each OPAT model, weekly costs ranged from EUR 1445 to EUR 2308. Conclusions: The diversity of OPAT coordination and monitoring practices identified within a single hospital suggests that similar trends may be observed in other settings, in France and elsewhere. Identifying the most cost-effective OPAT service model could guide stakeholders and facilitate the implementation of best practice recommendations in line with antimicrobial stewardship principles.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** infections (MESH:D007239), infectious disease (MESH:D003141)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12562083/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12562083/full.md

## References

40 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12562083/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12562083