# Electrochemical Behavior and Cytocompatibility of Titanium Dental Implants Under Different Chemical Treatments

**Authors:** Alexandra-Camelia Pogacian-Maier, Radu Septimiu Campian, Alexandru Mester, Marioara Moldovan, Ioan Petean, Emoke Pall, Simona Varvara, Andra Piciu, Dragos Ene

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines13102457 · Biomedicines · 2025-10-09

## TL;DR

This study examines how different chemical treatments affect titanium dental implants' stability and compatibility with human cells.

## Contribution

The study introduces a comparative analysis of chemical treatments on titanium implants using electrochemical and cytocompatibility assessments.

## Key findings

- Citric acid and Ringer’s solution preserved implant stability and supported high cell viability.
- Hydrogen peroxide and citric–phosphoric acid mixtures caused corrosion and reduced cell viability.
- EDTA-treated surfaces showed moderate viability but poor cell adhesion.

## Abstract

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of different chemical treatments on titanium implant surfaces and their biological compatibility. Methods: Titanium dental implants were immersed in Ringer’s solution, hydrogen peroxide (3%), citric acid (40%), EDTA (40%), or a citric–phosphoric acid mixture. Electrochemical behavior was analyzed using open-circuit potential monitoring and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy over 168 h. Cytocompatibility was assessed by culturing human gingival mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) directly on treated implants and in conditioned media, followed by viability evaluation through CCK-8 assays. Results: Citric acid and Ringer’s solution preserved passive film stability and supported high MSC viability (>75%) with minimal cytotoxic effects. Hydrogen peroxide and the citric–phosphoric acid mixture caused pronounced surface corrosion, decreased impedance stability, and significantly reduced cell viability (57–65%). EDTA-treated surfaces showed intermediate results, with moderate viability but impaired cell adhesion. Conclusion: The findings highlight the dual influence of chemical decontamination on implant stability and biological response. Citric acid and Ringer’s solution appear to be safer protocols for surface decontamination, whereas hydrogen peroxide and mixed acid treatments should be applied with caution due to their detrimental electrochemical and cytotoxic effects.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** hydrogen peroxide (PubChem CID 784), citric acid (PubChem CID 311), EDTA (PubChem CID 6049)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (taxon 9606)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** cytotoxic (MESH:D064420)
- **Chemicals:** Citric acid (MESH:D019343), CCK-8 (MESH:D012844), Hydrogen peroxide (MESH:D006861), phosphoric acid (MESH:C030242), Titanium (MESH:D014025), EDTA (MESH:D004492)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12561497/full.md

## Figures

9 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12561497/full.md

## References

47 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12561497/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12561497