# Influence of Florfenicol Treatments on Marine-Sediment Microbiomes: A Metagenomic Study of Bacterial Communities in Proximity to Salmon Aquaculture in Southern Chile

**Authors:** Sergio Lynch, Pamela Thomson, Rodrigo Santibañez, Ruben Avendaño-Herrera

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics14101016 · Antibiotics · 2025-10-13

## TL;DR

This study shows how using the antibiotic florfenicol in salmon farming affects the bacteria in nearby ocean sediments, reducing diversity and altering key microbial functions.

## Contribution

The study provides new insights into how florfenicol treatment in salmon aquaculture alters sediment microbiomes and their metabolic functions.

## Key findings

- Florfenicol treatment caused significant changes in bacterial phyla in marine sediments near salmon farms.
- Treated farms showed reduced alpha diversity and shifts in sulfur metabolism and lipid degradation pathways.
- Specific phyla like Firmicutes and Chloroflexi showed statistically significant abundance differences.

## Abstract

Background/Objectives: Metagenomic analyses are an important tool for understanding ecological effects, particularly in sites exposed to antimicrobial treatments. Marine sediments host diverse microbial communities and may serve as reservoirs for microbial resistance. Although it is known that antimicrobials can alter microbial composition, specific impacts on sediments surrounding salmon farms remain poorly understood. This study analyzed bacterial community structure in marine sediments subjected to florfenicol treatment from salmon farms in the Los Lagos Region of southern Chile. Methods: Sediment samples were collected and examined through DNA extraction and PCR amplification of the 16S rRNA gene (V3-V4 region). Sequences were analyzed using a bioinformatics pipeline, and amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) were taxonomically classified with a Naïve Bayesian classifier. The resulting ASV abundance were then used to predict metabolic functions and pathways via PICRUSt2, referencing the MetaCyc database. Results: Significant differences in bacterial phyla were observed between the control farm and two farms treated with florfenicol (17 mg kg−1 body weight per day) for 33 and 20 days, respectively. Farm 1 showed notable differences in phyla such as Bacteroidota, Bdellovibrionota, Crenarchaeota, Deferrisomatota, Desulfobacterota, Fibrobacterota, Firmicutes, and Fusobacteriota, while Farm 2 exhibited differences in the phyla Bdellovibrionota, Calditrichota, Crenarchaeota, Deferrisomatota, Desulfobacterota, Fusobacteriota, Nanoarchaeota, and Nitrospirota. Shannon Index analysis revealed a reduction in alpha diversity in the treated farms. Comparative analysis between the control and the treated farms showed pronounced shifts in the relative abundance of several bacterial phyla, including statistically significant differences in Chloroflexi and Firmicutes. Predicted functional pathways revealed a notable enrichment of L-methionine biosynthesis III in Farm 2, suggesting a shift in sulfur metabolism potentially driven by antimicrobial treatment. Additionally, increased activity in fatty acid oxidation pathways indicates a higher microbial potential for lipid degradation at this site. Conclusions: These findings highlight the considerable influence of florfenicol on sediment microbial communities and reinforce the need for sustainable management strategies to minimize ecological disruption and the spread of antimicrobial resistance.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** florfenicol (PubChem CID 114811)

## Full-text entities

- **Chemicals:** fatty acid (MESH:D005227), sulfur (MESH:D013455), lipid (MESH:D008055), L-methionine (MESH:D008715), Florfenicol (MESH:C035534)
- **Species:** Fusobacteriota (phylum) [taxon 32066], Nanobdellota (phylum) [taxon 192989], Nitrospirota (phylum) [taxon 40117], Fibrobacterota (phylum) [taxon 65842], Rubroshorea almon (species) [taxon 292004], Bacillota (clostridial firmicutes, phylum) [taxon 1239]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12561304/full.md

## Figures

6 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12561304/full.md

## References

55 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12561304/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12561304