Antihelix ulcer in anti-MDA5-positive dermatomyositis
Wenhan Huang, Lin Tang

Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsInflammatory Myopathies and Dermatomyositis · Eosinophilic Disorders and Syndromes · Skin Diseases and Diabetes
A 44-year-old woman presented to the rheumatology clinic with a 2-month history of cutaneous eruption, arthralgia and fatigue. Physical examination revealed Gottron’s papules, mechanic’s hands, V-neck sign and antihelix erythema with ulcer formation (Fig. 1). Proximal muscle strength was 4 according to the Medical Research Council scale. Laboratory findings revealed elevated ESR (52 mm/h) and serum ferritin (991.4 ng/ml). The level of creatine kinase was 487 U/l (reference range: 38–174). Test for anti-melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5 (MDA5) antibodies and anti-Ro52 antibodies were positive. Chest CT showed interstitial lung disease. MRI showed a high signal of thigh muscles on the T2-weighted image. The diagnosis of anti-MDA5-positive dermatomyositis was made. Treatment with methylprednisolone (i.v. therapy, 80 mg/d), cyclophosphamide (i.v. therapy, 0.4 g once/week) and tacrolimus (oral, 1 mg twice a day; the blood trough concentration was maintained at 5–10 ng/ml) was initiated.
Interstitial lung disease and skin involvement were two significant features of anti-MDA5 dermatomyositis. Apart from common manifestations, such as Gottron’s papules, V-neck and shawl sign, skin lesions in other areas were gradually being recognized as well. Antihelix and helix erythema were relatively rare in anti-MDA5 dermatomyositis. On the one hand, it is regarded as microvascular injury induced by pressure, just like decubitus [1]. On the other hand, it has been reported that persistent endoplasmic reticulum stress and unfolded protein response induced by the combination of MDA5 protein and protein kinase RNA-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase might be an important mechanism of vascular damage in anti-MDA5 dermatomyositis patients [2]. This patient has developed antihelix ulcers, indicating more severe vasculitis. Early combined immunotherapy is helpful to control the development of anti-MDA5 dermatomyositis.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Okiyama N , Inoue S, Saito A et al Antihelix/helix violaceous macules in Japanese patients with anti-melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5 (MDA 5) antibody-associated dermatomyositis. Br J Dermatol 2019;180:1226–7.30431155 10.1111/bjd.17431 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Zhao LQ , Yang XQ, Niu Q et al MDA 5 protein mediating persistent ER stress/unfolded protein response contributes to endothelial-mesenchymal-transition of lung microvascular endothelial cell in dermatomyositis. Cell Commun Signal 2025;23:149.40122798 10.1186/s 12964-025-02159-2PMC 11930013 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
