# Hyalomma dromedarii infesting camels in Hail Province, Saudi Arabia, carry antimicrobial resistant bacteria

**Authors:** Alanoud T. Aljasham, Sajith Raghunandanan, Raed Farzan, Abdulhadi M. Abdulwahed, Embalil Mathachan Aneesh, Sumiyaa Alharbi, Yusra Shukri, Mohammed Alshammari, Fuad Alanazi

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1662637 · Frontiers in Veterinary Science · 2025-10-14

## TL;DR

Camel ticks in Saudi Arabia carry bacteria resistant to some antibiotics, highlighting a potential risk for antimicrobial resistance.

## Contribution

This study identifies AMR bacteria in camel ticks from Saudi Arabia, emphasizing their role in antimicrobial resistance transmission.

## Key findings

- Most bacterial isolates from camel ticks were Gram-negative and showed resistance to cefazolin and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid.
- Gram-positive isolates showed universal resistance to fusidic acid and occasional resistance to other antibiotics.
- No multidrug resistance across three or more antibiotic classes was observed among the isolates.

## Abstract

Ticks are known vectors of various pathogens and are increasingly recognized as carriers of antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) bacteria. However, the role of camel ticks in AMR transmission remains poorly understood. In this study, we investigated bacteria isolated from Hyalomma dromedarii hard ticks collected from dromedary camels in Hail Province, Saudi Arabia, and assessed their AMR profiles. A total of 57 ticks were collected, yielding 29 bacterial isolates. The majority (79%; 23/29) were Gram-negative bacteria, primarily Enterobacter cloacae complex (n = 21) and Pseudomonas putida (n = 2). Gram-positive isolates (21%; 6/29) included Staphylococcus sciuri (n = 4) and Staphylococcus xylosus (n = 2). All Gram-negative isolates were resistant to cefazolin, 91% to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, and 8.7% to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, while remaining susceptible to higher-generation cephalosporins, carbapenems, and aminoglycosides. Among Gram-positive isolates, resistance to fusidic acid was universal, with occasional resistance to benzylpenicillin (33%) and erythromycin (17%). No multidrug resistance across three or more antibiotic classes was observed. These findings highlight the presence of clinically relevant AMR bacteria in camel ticks and underscore the need for targeted AMR surveillance in arid livestock regions. Such efforts are critical to understanding and mitigating AMR risks within the animal–human–environment interface of the One Health framework.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** cefazolin (PubChem CID 33255), amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (PubChem CID 6435924), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (PubChem CID 358641), carbapenems (PubChem CID 134085), fusidic acid (PubChem CID 3000226), benzylpenicillin (PubChem CID 5904), erythromycin (PubChem CID 12560)
- **Species:** Hyalomma dromedarii (taxon 34626)

## Full-text entities

- **Chemicals:** fusidic acid (MESH:D005672), cefazolin (MESH:D002437), erythromycin (MESH:D004917), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (MESH:D015662), carbapenems (MESH:D015780), aminoglycosides (MESH:D000617), amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (MESH:D019980), benzylpenicillin (MESH:D010400), cephalosporins (MESH:D002511)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Enterobacter cloacae complex (species group) [taxon 354276], Mammaliicoccus sciuri (species) [taxon 1296], Staphylococcus xylosus (species) [taxon 1288], Hyalomma dromedarii (species) [taxon 34626], Ixodida (ticks, order) [taxon 6935], Bacteria Latreille et al. 1825 (Bacteria stick insect, genus) [taxon 629395], Pseudomonas putida (species) [taxon 303]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12560145/full.md

## Figures

5 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12560145/full.md

## References

51 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12560145/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12560145