# Optimizing dosimetric leaf gap parameters for radiation therapy: A comparative study using three diode‐array verification tools and an ionization chamber

**Authors:** Yoshitsugu Matsumoto, Ryosuke Sato, Natsumi Futakami, Tsuyoshi Fukuzawa, Ryuta Nagao, Toshihisa Kuroki, Tatsuya Mikami, Yoji Nakano, Yuri Toyoda, Koichi Fukumoto, Akitomo Sugawara

PMC · DOI: 10.1002/acm2.70280 · Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics · 2025-10-28

## TL;DR

This study compares different dosimeters to determine optimal dosimetric leaf gap values in radiation therapy, finding that diode arrays can reliably match ionization chamber results.

## Contribution

The study demonstrates that diode array dosimeters can reliably reproduce ionization chamber-based dosimetric leaf gap values within clinically acceptable ranges.

## Key findings

- Diode arrays showed dose deviations of 0.27% to 1.05% compared to ionization chamber results.
- Gamma pass rates using IC-based DLG values averaged 98.7% ± 2.3% under 3%/3 mm criteria.
- DLG differences between IC and diode arrays were within −0.80 to 0.26 mm across all beam types.

## Abstract

The dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) value is a key parameter that affects dose calculation accuracy in radiotherapy when using the Eclipse treatment planning system. Diode array dosimeters are used to determine the optimal DLG value because they are convenient and fast, providing instant readout of planar dose distributions rather than a point dose. However, variations in gamma pass rates (GPRs) across devices, even for the same radiotherapy treatment plan, may lead to different DLG determinations.

To compare the optimal DLG values determined using three ‐diode array dosimeters with those obtained using an ionization chamber (IC) and to evaluate whether diode array dosimeters can reliably reproduce IC‐based DLG values.

Optimal DLG values were determined for 6 MV, 10 MV, and flattening filter‐free (FFF) beams using ArcCHECK, Delta4, and SRS MapCHECK. The results were compared with the IC‐based values across all energies. Radiochromic films validated the IC‐based DLG values. Twenty volumetric modulated arc therapy plans were recalculated using ten different DLG values. The results were compared with the measured data. Optimal DLG values were determined using global gamma criteria (3%/2 mm and 2%/2 mm), local gamma (1%/1 mm), and dose difference criteria.

Verification with radiochromic film using IC‐based optimal DLG values yielded an average GPR of 98.7 ± 2.3% under the 3%/3 mm criterion. The average DLG difference between the IC and diode array dosimeters was −0.35 ± 0.23 mm (range: −0.80 to 0.26 mm), based on various gamma and dose difference criteria. A DLG difference of −0.35 mm showed dose deviations ranging from 0.27% to 1.05% across all beams. Except for one criterion, no significant differences were observed.

DLG differences between IC and diode array dosimeters resulted in approximately 1% dose discrepancies, which are within the clinically acceptable range. This finding indicates that ArcCHECK, Delta4, and SRS MapCHECK can determine DLG values comparable to those obtained with IC.

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** DLL4 (delta like canonical Notch ligand 4) [NCBI Gene 54567] {aka AOS6, delta4, hdelta2}, SRS [NCBI Gene 140821]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12560010/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12560010/full.md

## References

25 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12560010/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12560010