From theory to practice of designing for diversity: Applying intersectionality to improve HIV testing uptake
Elham Ghasemi, Fatemeh Rajabi, Reza Majdzadeh, Allanise Cloete-Mapingire, Allanise Cloete-Mapingire, Emily Hotez, Magdalena Szaflarski, Magdalena Szaflarski

TL;DR
This paper shows how intersectionality can be used to design an HIV testing intervention for Afghan immigrants in Iran, aiming to reduce health inequalities.
Contribution
The paper provides a practical framework for applying intersectionality in health interventions to address inequalities.
Findings
An intersectionality-based peer-led intervention was developed to improve HIV testing uptake among Afghan immigrants in Iran.
The intervention includes strategies like information provision, support, community-based services, and structural changes.
The study highlights the importance of adapting interventions to the specific needs and contexts of marginalized groups.
Abstract
Given the critical perspective of intersectionality and its potential to identify the causes of inequalities, it has been employed increasingly in studies related to health. Despite the rich theoretical evidence about intersectionality, there is a need to consider this approach empirically. This study aimed to apply the intersectionality in practice for health policy makers and researchers seeking to reduce health inequalities. In this regard, we described the development of an intersectionality-based and context-specific intervention focusing on HIV testing uptake among Afghan immigrants in Iran. This is an intervention development study. The intersectionality was used to design a peer-led intervention guided by the 2008 MRC framework. We undertook the following activities related to the three stages of the MRC framework: 1. Identifying the existing evidence (conducting a scoping…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHealth Policy Implementation Science · LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy · Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
