# Comparison of amyloid chronicity and EYO in autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease

**Authors:** Julie K. Wisch, Nicole S. McKay, Matthew Zammit, Bradley T. Christian, Stephanie A. Schultz, Peter R. Millar, Natalie S. Ryan, David M. Cash, Christopher R. S. Belder, Patricio Chrem, Carlos Cruchaga, Laura Ibanez, Mathias Jucker, Igor Yakushev, Gregory S Day, Mei Murphy, Jorge Llibre‐Guerra, David Aguillon, Jee Hoon Roh, Chengjie Xiong, Guoqiao Wang, Yan Li, Suzanne E. Schindler, Cliff Jack, Eric McDade, Randall J. Bateman, Tammie L. S. Benzinger, Beau M. Ances, Tobey Betthauser, Brian Gordon

PMC · DOI: 10.1002/alz.70812 · 2025-10-25

## TL;DR

The study compares amyloid chronicity and estimated years to onset in autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease to understand preclinical phases and symptom progression.

## Contribution

The study introduces SILA, a method to estimate age at amyloid positivity with high accuracy in autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease.

## Key findings

- SILA estimates age at amyloid positivity with a mean absolute error of less than 2 years.
- Estimated years to symptom onset (EYO) better predicts symptom onset than amyloid chronicity.
- APP mutation carriers show atypical amyloid accumulation patterns.

## Abstract

Preclinical Alzheimer's disease (AD) can be described relative to biomarker positivity onset time.

We estimated time from amyloid positivity (A+) using sampled iterative local approximation (SILA) in a longitudinal autosomal dominant AD (ADAD) sample (N = 379) with amyloid positron emission tomography. We compared (1) predicted age at A+ to imputed age, (2) estimated age at A+ to estimated age at symptom onset, and (3) variance in cognitive performance explained.

Mean error between imputed and SILA‐estimated age at A+ (N = 26) was 1.15 years. Age at A+ explained 39% of estimated years to symptom onset (EYO) variance. Time from A+ explained 19% of cognitive composite variance and 14% of Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes CDR‐SB variance; EYO explained 43% and 57%, respectively.

SILA estimates A+ age in ADAD with reasonably good accuracy. SILA‐estimated time from A+ describes the start of pathology, but the time from A+ onset to symptoms is variable in ADAD and better described by EYO.

Amyloid chronicity predicts a 14‐year preclinical AD phase in ADAD.SILA accurately estimates age at A+ (MAE < 2 years).EYO outperforms chronicity in predicting symptom onset.APP mutation carriers show atypical amyloid accumulation.Chronicity models help reveal AD heterogeneity in preclinical stages.

Amyloid chronicity predicts a 14‐year preclinical AD phase in ADAD.

SILA accurately estimates age at A+ (MAE < 2 years).

EYO outperforms chronicity in predicting symptom onset.

APP mutation carriers show atypical amyloid accumulation.

Chronicity models help reveal AD heterogeneity in preclinical stages.

## Linked entities

- **Genes:** APP (amyloid beta precursor protein) [NCBI Gene 351]
- **Diseases:** Alzheimer's disease (MONDO:0004975)

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** APP (amyloid beta precursor protein) [NCBI Gene 351] {aka AAA, ABETA, ABPP, AD1, APPI, CTFgamma}
- **Diseases:** Amyloid (MESH:C000718787), Dementia (MESH:D003704), AD (MESH:D000544)

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12552894/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12552894