# Treatment persistence and overall survival in myelofibrosis treated with ruxolitinib were not affected by the covid-19 pandemic, despite the reduced starting dose: Analysis of AIFA registries

**Authors:** Massimo Breccia, Simone Celant, Francesca Palandri, Francesco Passamonti, Pier Paolo Olimpieri, Valentina Summa, Annalisa Guarcello, Giuseppe Alberto Palumbo, Fabrizio Pane, Paola Guglielmelli, Pierluigi Zinzani, Paolo Corradini, Pierluigi Russo

PMC · DOI: 10.1007/s00277-025-06601-w · 2025-09-20

## TL;DR

The study found that the COVID-19 pandemic did not impact treatment persistence or survival in myelofibrosis patients taking ruxolitinib, even with a lower starting dose.

## Contribution

This is the first study to show that the pandemic did not negatively affect treatment outcomes for myelofibrosis patients on ruxolitinib.

## Key findings

- Patients treated after the pandemic had similar overall survival compared to those treated before.
- The likelihood of stopping treatment was not significantly different between the two groups.
- Despite a reduced starting dose post-pandemic, treatment persistence remained unaffected.

## Abstract

We analyzed the outcome of 2229 patients with myelofibrosis (MF) treated with ruxolitinib before and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Two populations of MF were defined from the AIFA web monitoring registries: the pre-COVID-19 (1703, 76.4%) and the post-COVID-19 (526, 23.6%) cohorts. The two populations were balanced using the Inversity Probability of Treatment Weighting. The median age was 69 years and 73 years in the pre- and post- COVID-19 era, respectively. There were no differences in spleen diameters at baseline prior to ruxolitinib in the two groups, but a difference in median spleen volume was noted (961 cm3 in the pre-era and 788.3 cm3 in the post-era). Overall, intermediate-2 IPSS risk were 67.2% in the pre- and 72% in the post-era, whereas the high-risk category was 32.7% and 27.9%, respectively. More patients started on a reduced dose in the post-COVID-19 era (73.5% versus 65% in the pre-era). After adjusting for the differences, an analysis of overall survival revealed no differences between the two groups (HR 0.875, p > 0.05). Patients who started ruxolitinib after COVID-19 had similar probability to stop treatment in the follow-up (HR 0.956, p > 0.05). The results indicate that COVID-19 did not affect the duration of treatment and the relative OS.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** ruxolitinib (PubChem CID 17754772)
- **Diseases:** myelofibrosis (MONDO:0044903), COVID-19 (MONDO:0100096)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** COVID-19 (MESH:D000086382), MF (MESH:D055728)
- **Chemicals:** ruxolitinib (MESH:C540383)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12552246/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12552246