# MIASurviveMTP: Machine learning for immediate assessment and survival prediction after massive transfusion protocol

**Authors:** Michael D. Cobler-Lichter, Jessica M. Delamater, Brianna L. Collie, Nicole B. Lyons, Luciana Tito Bustillos, Nicholas Namias, Brandon M. Parker, Jonathan P. Meizoso, Kenneth G. Proctor, Laila Cure, Laila Cure, Laila Cure, Laila Cure

PMC · DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0335151 · 2025-10-24

## TL;DR

This paper introduces a machine learning model that predicts survival in trauma patients receiving large blood transfusions, using data from medical records to improve early triage and resource allocation.

## Contribution

The paper presents novel machine learning models specifically trained on massive and ultramassive transfusion patients for mortality prediction.

## Key findings

- ML models achieved an AUROC of 0.901 for MT and 0.858 for UMT using arrival data.
- Incorporating 4-hour data improved AUROC to 0.943 for MT and 0.922 for UMT.
- These are the first ML models trained specifically on MT and UMT patient data.

## Abstract

Early triage of trauma patients requiring massive transfusion (MT) may help to marshal appropriate resources and improve treatment and outcome. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) offer theoretical advantages compared to conventional prediction algorithms but have not been thoroughly evaluated in this population. We hypothesized that AI/ML techniques incorporating all available data in a patient’s medical record could achieve similar, if not higher, performance in the prediction of mortality in MT patients as compared to existing models. Patients from the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Project database (TQIP) were retrospectively reviewed. Those receiving ≥ 5 units of red blood cells and/or whole blood within the first four hours of arrival were defined as MT patients. Those receiving ≥10 units were identified as ultramassive transfusion (UMT) patients. ML models were created to predict 6-hour mortality using variables available at different time points, including patient arrival. Of 5,481,046 patients in TQIP from 2017 to 2021, 47,744 received MT and 20,337 of these received UMT. Using only variables available on arrival, MT AUROC was 0.901 [95% CI 0.895–0.910] which increased to 0.943 [95% CI 0.938–0.948] with addition of 4-hour variables. For UMT, arrival AUROC was 0.858 [95% CI 0.846–0.872] and increased to 0.922 [95% CI 0.914–0.931] at 4 hours. ML models reliably predict mortality in both MT and UMT patients. These are the only ML models trained on MT and UMT patients. Future work can focus on prospective implementation of these models with potential direct integration into the electronic medical record. Real-time utilization of comprehensive patient data may enhance clinical decision-making regarding which patients should continue receiving massive transfusion, thus optimizing the allocation of this limited resource.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** Trauma (MESH:D014947)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Figures

9 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12551842/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12551842