Intended and experienced literacy practices in a Swedish undergraduate nursing education
Maria Christidis, Nikolaos Christidis, Viveca Lindberg, Kristina Gottberg, Carina Georg, Olugbenga Ige, Olugbenga Ige, Olugbenga Ige, Olugbenga Ige

TL;DR
This study examines how academic and professional literacy are taught in a Swedish nursing program and how students take notes, finding a stronger focus on academic skills than professional ones.
Contribution
The study provides insights into the integration of academic and professional literacy in nursing education and highlights gaps in preparing students for clinical communication.
Findings
Academic literacy is emphasized through writing and projects, while professional literacy is spread across semesters.
Students primarily use note-taking for memorization and exams, with limited focus on professional needs.
The curriculum needs better scaffolding of literacy practices to prepare students for clinical roles.
Abstract
Academic literacy in higher education has been widely studied, but less attention has been given to literacy practices within professional programmes such as nursing education. This study aimed to analyze one Swedish undergraduate nursing programme regarding the presence of academic and professional literacy, and secondarily to explore students’ note-taking as a component of literacy practices. The study employed a descriptive and exploratory design, analyzing curriculum documents and surveying nursing students. An analysis of the intended curriculum (course syllabi) of a three-year undergraduate nursing programme at Karolinska Institutet was conducted to identify explicit and implicit literacy components. A digital questionnaire focusing on note-taking practices was distributed to second-semester students (n = 67; response rate 40%). Closed questions were analyzed using descriptive…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNursing Diagnosis and Documentation · Health Sciences Research and Education · Health Education and Validation
