# Risk Stratification Tools and Scoring Systems in Perforated Viscus: A Systematic Review

**Authors:** Murhaf Assaf, Shrey K Solanki, Ridham N Patel, Kinza Ali, Miqdad Qandeel, Nimrah Majeed, Shabeh E Roshan Ali, Mazin Osman, Kiranjot Kaur, Shahid Khan

PMC · DOI: 10.7759/cureus.93101 · Cureus · 2025-09-24

## TL;DR

This paper reviews various risk stratification tools for perforated viscus to determine their effectiveness in different medical settings.

## Contribution

The study systematically compares existing scoring systems and suggests the need for hybrid models tailored to specific clinical contexts.

## Key findings

- Simpler models like Boey and MPI are suitable for emergency and resource-limited settings.
- PULP and APACHE-II provide higher precision in tertiary centers by incorporating systemic factors.
- POSSUM balances physiology and operative severity but may overestimate mortality.

## Abstract

Perforated viscus remains a high-risk surgical emergency with significant mortality despite advances in perioperative care. Accurate risk stratification is essential to guide triage, surgical decision-making, and postoperative management. The available scoring tools are the Boey score (three-variable risk model: shock, comorbidity, delay >24 hours), Peptic Ulcer Perforation (PULP) score, Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI), Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the Enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity (POSSUM), and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE-II), each addressing different dimensions of patient risk, ranging from physiological stability to intra-abdominal severity. Simpler models such as Boey and MPI are valuable in emergency and resource-limited settings due to their bedside applicability. In contrast, PULP and APACHE-II offer greater precision by integrating systemic comorbidities and biochemical indices, making them more suitable for tertiary centers. POSSUM provides a balanced approach by combining physiology with operative severity, though it may overestimate mortality. No single model is universally applicable, highlighting the need for context-specific use. Future research should focus on hybrid scoring systems that merge clinical simplicity with modern predictive analytics for broader global relevance.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** Perforated Viscus (MESH:D057112), Peritonitis (MESH:D010538), PULP (MESH:D010439), Mortality (MESH:D003643), shock (MESH:D012769)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12551434/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12551434/full.md

## References

15 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12551434/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12551434