# Examining State Policies and Administrative Factors as Determinants of Consumer-Reported Unmet Service Needs in Publicly Funded Home- and Community-Based Services in the United States

**Authors:** Romil R. Parikh, Tetyana P. Shippee, Benjamin Langworthy, Zheng Wang, Stephanie Giordano, Eric Jutkowitz

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/jmahp13040051 · Journal of Market Access & Health Policy · 2025-10-02

## TL;DR

This study explores how state policies and administrative factors affect unmet service needs for home- and community-based services in the U.S.

## Contribution

The study identifies specific state-level factors that influence consumer-reported unmet service needs in publicly funded HCBS.

## Key findings

- Higher Medicaid managed care enrollment and Medicaid expansion were linked to lower odds of unmet service needs.
- Greater HCBS spending relative to institutional care spending was associated with higher odds of unmet service needs.
- Consumers in PACE and Managed Long-Term Services had significantly lower odds of unmet service needs compared to Medicaid waiver programs.

## Abstract

Access to home- and community-based services (HCBSs) varies substantially between states. Yet, it is unknown how state-level policies and administrative factors impact consumer-reported unmet service needs, an important indicator of HCBS access and quality. Using the National Core Indicators—Aging and Disability Adult Consumer Survey (2016–2019; n = 13,654 community-dwelling older adults, 13 states), we examined associations between unmet HCBS needs with four state-level factors: HCBS spending relative to institutional care spending, HCBS spending per client, percentage of Medicaid beneficiaries in managed care, and Medicaid expansion; and funding program. In the adjusted logistic regression model, the odds of overall unmet HCBS needs were lower with higher percentage Medicaid beneficiaries in managed care (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89–0.96) and Medicaid expansion (aOR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.73–0.87) but greater with higher HCBS spending relative to institutional care spending (aOR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.11–1.28). Compared to Medicaid waiver, odds of unmet HCBS needs were significantly lower among consumers in Managed Long-Term Services and Supports (aOR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.61–0.74) and Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE; aOR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.31–0.49). State policies and administrative factors are important place-based determinants of HCBS consumers’ unmet HCBS needs/access; and warrant consideration in HCBS quality assurance and improvement.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** brain injury (MESH:D001930), COVID-19 (MESH:D000086382), health (OMIM:603663), depression (MESH:D003866), Dementias (MESH:D003704), developmental disabilities (MESH:D002658), Disability (MESH:D009069), injury to (MESH:D014947), physical disability (MESH:D059445), mental illness (MESH:D001523), AD (MESH:D000544)
- **Chemicals:** HCBS (-)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12551106/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12551106/full.md

## References

34 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12551106/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12551106