# Reporter-Mediated Evaluation of the Circadian Oscillations of SNAIL Across In Vitro Models

**Authors:** Kaitlyn Chhe, Bhavna Kalyanaraman, Sophie A. Spielberger, Hui-Hsien Lin, Stephanie R. Taylor, Michelle E. Farkas

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/clockssleep7040054 · Clocks & Sleep · 2025-09-28

## TL;DR

This study shows that the protein SNAIL, linked to cancer, has circadian rhythms in some cells but not others, suggesting its regulation depends on the cell type.

## Contribution

The study introduces a luciferase reporter to evaluate SNAIL's circadian oscillations across different breast cancer models.

## Key findings

- SNAIL oscillations were rhythmic in U2OS cells but weak in MCF7 and arrhythmic in MDA-MB-231 cells.
- MCF10A cells showed no SNAIL oscillations despite strong circadian clock gene activity.
- SNAIL's circadian regulation appears to be cell line and tissue dependent.

## Abstract

The protein SNAIL has been widely studied for its roles in promoting cancer invasion and resistance to apoptosis. There are multiple contributors to its expression, including self- and circadian regulation, and it has been posited that SNAIL oscillates in a circadian manner. Given the multiple factors involved, we sought to determine whether this is indeed the case. We developed a luciferase reporter that was used to demonstrate SNAIL’s rhythmic nature (SNAIL:luc) in the circadian model cell line, U2OS. Considering SNAIL’s relevance in breast cancer, we also assessed its oscillations in cellular models representing different levels of aggression. We incorporated the SNAIL:luc reporter in MCF10A breast epithelial cells, and MCF7 and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell lines, which are less and more aggressive, respectively. We found that SNAIL oscillations were present but weak in MCF7 and arrhythmic in MDA-MB-231 cells, correlating with those of core clock genes (BMAL1 and PER2) in these models. Surprisingly, MCF10A cells, whose core clock genes possess robust circadian expression patterns, did not have rhythmic oscillations of SNAIL. Our findings suggest that SNAIL is under circadian control, but this is cell line/tissue dependent, setting the stage for additional studies to better understand the impacts of various factors contributing to its expression.

## Linked entities

- **Genes:** SNAI1 (snail family transcriptional repressor 1) [NCBI Gene 6615], BMAL1 (basic helix-loop-helix ARNT like 1) [NCBI Gene 406], PER2 (period circadian regulator 2) [NCBI Gene 8864]
- **Proteins:** SNAI1 (snail family transcriptional repressor 1)
- **Diseases:** breast cancer (MONDO:0004989)

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** PER2 (period circadian regulator 2) [NCBI Gene 8864] {aka FASPS, FASPS1}, BMAL1 (basic helix-loop-helix ARNT like 1) [NCBI Gene 406] {aka ARNTL, ARNTL1, BMAL1c, JAP3, MOP3, PASD3}
- **Diseases:** arrhythmic (OMIM:212500), aggression (MESH:D010554), cancer (MESH:D009369), breast cancer (MESH:D001943)
- **Cell lines:** U2OS — Homo sapiens (Human), Osteosarcoma, Cancer cell line (CVCL_0042), MDA-MB-231 — Homo sapiens (Human), Breast adenocarcinoma, Cancer cell line (CVCL_0062), MCF7 — Homo sapiens (Human), Invasive breast carcinoma of no special type, Cancer cell line (CVCL_0031), MCF10A — Homo sapiens (Human), Spontaneously immortalized cell line (CVCL_0598)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12550899/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12550899/full.md

## References

80 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12550899/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12550899