# Cerina—Cognitive Behavioral Therapy–Based Mobile App for Managing Generalized Anxiety Disorder Symptoms Among University Students: Results From a Pilot Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial

## TL;DR

A mobile app based on cognitive behavioral therapy reduced anxiety symptoms in university students in a pilot study.

## Contribution

The study demonstrates the feasibility and potential effectiveness of an unguided digital CBT app for managing GAD in students.

## Key findings

- The Cerina app significantly reduced GAD symptoms and worry in participants who completed sessions.
- Intention-to-treat analyses showed medium effect sizes favoring the app over a waitlist control.
- Low session completion rates suggest usability challenges need addressing for broader adoption.

## Abstract

Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is common among university students due to academic pressure and financial uncertainty, among other challenges. Despite the need, the receipt of available psychological services is often low.

This study investigates the feasibility of a digital unguided cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)–based mobile app, Cerina, and examines the likely effects of this intervention in reducing GAD symptoms compared to the waitlist control group.

Eligible students (n=158) with mild to moderate GAD symptoms were self-assessed through web-based questionnaires and were randomly allocated to the intervention group (n=79) or to the waitlist control group (n=79) following their informed consent. The intervention group had direct access to Cerina and followed CBT-based interactive sessions for 6 weeks. The waitlist control group participants had access to optional on-campus well-being services, and they were given access to Cerina 6 weeks after their randomization. Participants completed assessments on anxiety, depression, worry, and usability at three time points. Additionally, upon completing the intervention, they were invited to a web-based interview to understand the implementation of the intervention in more depth.

On average, 13% (10/79) intervention group participants dropped out, 61% (36/69) completed the core clinical content (2 sessions), and 12% (7/69) completed the desired number of sessions (6 or 7 sessions). Analyses of the completers (2 or more sessions) revealed significant group differences in GAD (mean 8.4, SD 3.7; t42=–2.25; P=.03; d=–0.7) and worry symptoms (mean 42.3, SD 10.8; t42=–2.50; P=.02; d=–0.8), as well as functional impairment (mean 16.7, SD 2.44; t42=–2.12; P=.04; d=–0.6) in favor of the intervention group at posttest with medium to large effect sizes. The intention-to-treat analyses confirmed significant group differences in GAD (mean 8.47, SD 2.7; t156=–2.23; P=.03; d=–0.4), and there were marginally nonsignificant group differences in worry symptoms (mean 41.5, SD 8.40; t156=–1.94; P=.05; d=–0.3) in favor of the intervention group at posttest with medium effect sizes. These results suggest that the intervention had a meaningful impact on reducing GAD symptoms and a modest impact on reducing worry symptoms among participants.

The Cerina app showed promising results in reducing GAD symptoms among students. This result supports findings from other randomized controlled trials showing that digital CBT-based interventions are effective and feasible for a wide range of age groups and populations experiencing GAD symptoms. The low number of participants completing the recommended number of sessions suggests a usability issue. To address this, the intervention could be refined through an iterative design process informed by user feedback, and the long-term impact of specific engagement features in improving usability and retention could be assessed through extended evaluations.

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06146530; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06146530

RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083554