# Greening vision: balancing clinical excellence and ecological sustainability in eye health

## TL;DR

This paper examines how eye care can become more environmentally sustainable without compromising clinical quality.

## Contribution

The paper introduces a three-dimensional analysis framework and proposes innovations for green ophthalmology.

## Key findings

- Ophthalmic practices show significant cross-national differences in surgical emissions.
- Technological advancements in eye surgery have increased environmental impact over time.
- The paper suggests integrating a 'triple bottom line' approach to balance clinical, economic, and environmental factors.

## Abstract

The rapid advancement of ophthalmic medicine has significantly improved global visual health but concurrently imposed substantial ecological costs, creating an environmental paradox between efficient treatment and sustainability. This review explores the multifaceted carbon footprint of ophthalmic practices through a three-dimensional analysis: spatially, revealing stark cross-national differences in surgical emissions; temporally, tracking the environmental impact of technological evolution from extracapsular cataract extraction to phacoemulsification and vitreous surgery; and technologically, highlighting the role of disposable instruments, biomaterials, and energy consumption. It further presents an innovation matrix for “green ophthalmology,” encompassing technological breakthroughs, process optimizations, and behavioral interventions. The review emphasizes the need to integrate the “triple bottom line” (clinical, economic, environmental) into practice and policy, proposing future directions such as blockchain-based certification systems and standardized environmental assessment tools. Ultimately, it calls for multi-level actions-from individual clinicians to global governance-to reconcile high-quality eye care with ecological sustainability.