Correction: The future of digital donation crowdfunding
Siriphong Sirisawat, Pattanaporn Chatjuthamard, Supaporn Kiattisin, Sirimon Treepongkaruna
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance · Microfinance and Financial Inclusion · Sharing Economy and Platforms
In the Methods subsection of the Data collection process, there is a missing sentence. The correct sentence is: As our study is human subject research, we sought required approval from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) to conduct this research. After receiving this approval, we began collecting data through interviews with stakeholders and experts, taking notes and voice recordings. Interview lengths range from 45 to 60 minutes. We then utilised data collected to create a Futures Wheel and conducted a cross matrix scenario analysis. The certificate details are as follows: COA No. MU-CIRB 2020/163.1410.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.