Author Correction: CpG island turnover events predict evolutionary changes in enhancer activity
Acadia A. Kocher, Emily V. Dutrow, Severin Uebbing, Kristina M. Yim, María F. Rosales Larios, Marybeth Baumgartner, Timothy Nottoli, James P. Noonan
Abstract
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling · Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics · Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
Author Correction: Genome Biology 25, 156 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-024–03300-z
Following publication of the original article [1], the authors reported an error in the description of the confidence interval shown by box-and-whisker plots in Figs. 1C, 1D, 2C, 2D, and 3E. Previously the legends for these figure panels incorrectly reported that whiskers indicate the 90% confidence interval. They have now been corrected to state that “Box plots show the interquartile range and median, and whiskers indicate the 80% confidence interval.” The same correction has been made to the legends of the following supplementary figures in Additional file 1: Fig. S4B, panels A and B of Figs. S8-11, Figs. S15-19, and Fig. S31. Corrected legends now state that “Box plots show the interquartile range and median, and whiskers indicate the 80% confidence interval.”
These errors do not change any results and conclusions of the paper.
The original article [1] has been corrected.
Supplementary Information
Additional file 1: Supplementary figures S1-S51.