Perceptions of a Diverse Group of U.S. Women on the Ease of Vaginal Self-Sampling for Cancer Detection
Parker O’Connell, Roaa Rafat Mohamed, Amy Delicia Akineza, Arnaud Iradukunda, Christina Burns, Ozlem Equils

TL;DR
This study explores how U.S. women, especially those with lower education, perceive the ease of using at-home vaginal self-sampling for cervical cancer screening.
Contribution
The study identifies formal education as a key factor influencing women's comfort with self-sampling methods for cervical cancer detection.
Findings
Women with middle school or less education were more likely to find vaginal self-collection difficult compared to those with higher education.
Hispanic/Latino and first-generation immigrant women were overrepresented in the study sample.
The study highlights the need for further research to address education-related disparities in cancer screening acceptance.
Abstract
The recent Food and Drug Administration approval of a cervical self-collection method for human papillomavirus detection offers a promising opportunity to improve access to cervical cancer screenings. This study evaluates patients’ perceptions of self-collection methods and identifies factors influencing their acceptance. MiOra health educators conducted a pilot, cross-sectional, convenience sampling study in Los Angeles County, California, using an Institutional Review Board-approved Qualtrics electronic survey targeting low socioeconomic women. Participants evaluated the perceived ease or difficulty of at-home self-collection methods for vaginal and nasopharyngeal swabs. Associations between sociodemographic, behavioral, and contextual factors with self-sampling preferences were analyzed using chi-square test. Statistical significance was set at 5%, and data were analyzed in R…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCervical Cancer and HPV Research · Global Cancer Incidence and Screening · Ethics in Clinical Research
