Underdiagnosis of positive resection margins and synchronous peritoneal metastases in locally advanced colon cancer: histopathological reassessment of primary resection in the COLOPEC trial
E.S. Zwanenburg, D. D. Wisselink, C. E. L. Klaver, J. D. W. van der Bilt, J. G. van den Berg, L. L. Kodach, I. D. Nagtegaal, P. J. Tanis, P. Snaebjornsson

TL;DR
This study found that positive surgical margins and hidden peritoneal metastases in colon cancer are often missed, affecting recurrence rates and highlighting the need for better communication between surgeons and pathologists.
Contribution
The study reveals underdiagnosed clinicopathological features in locally advanced colon cancer specimens, emphasizing the importance of reassessing surgical margins and peritoneal metastases.
Findings
Positive resection margins (R+) were found in 14.1% of cases, with some misclassified.
Synchronous peritoneal metastases were present in 5.5% of cases, with 9 cases misclassified.
Both R+ and peritoneal metastases were strongly associated with peritoneal recurrence.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to perform histopathological reassessment of primary resections of locally advanced colon cancer (CC) within a randomized controlled trial, with specific focus on surgical margins and synchronous locoregional peritoneal metastases (SL-PM), and to provide learning points for both surgeons and pathologists. All histopathological slides of patients with c/pT4N0-2M0 or perforated CC included in the COLOPEC trial were reassessed and correlated with surgical reports. The COLOPEC trial originally determined the value of prophylactic hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Frequency of positive margins (R +), R + subtypes, and SL-PM and the association with 5-year peritoneal recurrence were analyzed. Histopathological slides of 199 patients were reassessed. R + was present in 28 patients (14.1%), of which 8 occurred at the site of adhesiolysis (originally…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsIntraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies · Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis · Amoebic Infections and Treatments
