Does environmental attention differ during walking, jogging, and cycling in greenways? Evidence from eye movement responses to videos
Yidian Pan, Chang Liu, Yue Liu, Yuhan Liu, Jiayi Zhao, Yongrong Zheng, Songjun He

TL;DR
This study explores how attention to the environment differs when people walk, jog, or cycle in greenways, using eye movement data to understand how different activities affect focus on natural elements.
Contribution
The study introduces new insights into how different physical activities in greenways influence environmental attention and cognitive responses.
Findings
Vegetation received the most attention across all activities, with more fixations and longer fixation durations.
Joggers showed more concentrated attention with lower blink rates and longer fixations on roads compared to walkers and cyclists.
Cyclists were more attracted to distant views and open water bodies, with higher fixation rates on water.
Abstract
Greenways accommodate various path-based physical activities (PPAs). This study aimed to examine the similarities and disparities in environmental attention and cognitive responses during different greenway PPAs. The eye movements of 26 participants were recorded while watching a greenway video during walking, jogging, and cycling in counterbalanced sequences. The results of the Kruskal–Wallis test indicate that (1) in terms of similarities, vegetation received the most attention with a higher number of fixations (rNF) and a greater total fixation duration (rTDF) compared to other areas of interest (AOIs). However, roads demanded more cognitive activities for spatial orientation as indicated by the longest average fixation duration (rAFD). (2) Regarding disparities, walkers showed a greater fascination with vegetation, displaying a higher rTDF than joggers and cyclists and a longer…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsUrban Green Space and Health · Urban Transport and Accessibility · Impact of Light on Environment and Health
