# Association between malnutrition diagnosed by different screening and assessment tools and clinical outcomes: an umbrella review

**Authors:** Zhinan Li, Yueying Lin, Yanmei Shi, Ting Yang, Liya An, Yuxing Qi, Pengcheng Zhang, Xingzong Huang, Xianming Su, Yinlong Deng, Jian Hu, Guobin Liu, Dali Sun

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1676201 · Frontiers in Nutrition · 2025-10-09

## TL;DR

This study reviews how different malnutrition diagnostic tools relate to clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients, identifying which tools are most effective.

## Contribution

The study provides a comprehensive umbrella review of malnutrition diagnostic tools and their associations with clinical outcomes.

## Key findings

- Malnutrition diagnosed by PNI, GNRI, and CONUT showed strong evidence for predicting oncological survival.
- For nontumor patients, PNI, BMI < 18.5, GNRI, and CONUT were highly recommended for predicting poor outcomes.
- Some tools showed significant correlations but require further validation in high-quality studies.

## Abstract

Malnutrition can lead to adverse clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients, timely and accurate diagnosis of malnutrition is crucial for initiating early nutritional support programs. To assess the correlation between malnutrition diagnosed by different malnutrition diagnostic tools and patients’ clinical outcomes.

Meta-analyses of the associations between malnutrition and patients’ clinical outcomes were screened and included by searching databases. For each association, this study used fixed and random effects models, calculated 95% CI (confidence intervals) and 95% PI (prediction intervals), and assessed heterogeneity, evidence of small-study effects, and excess significance bias.

A total of 138 meta-analyses were included in this study, and 407 associations were evaluated. For oncology patients, malnutrition diagnosed by eight tools was associated with oncological survival, with three evidence scores of PNI (prognostic nutritional index), GNRI (geriatric nutritional risk index), and CONUT (controlling nutritional status) being highly recommended (Class II). For nontumor patients, malnutrition diagnosed by nine tools was associated with poor clinical outcomes, with four tools with high evidence scores (Class II) of PNI, BMI (body mass index) < 18.5 kg/m2, GNRI, and CONUT being highly recommended.

This study demonstrated a significant correlation (Class II) between malnutrition diagnosed by four tools, the PNI, BMI < 18.5 kg/m2, GNRI, and CONUT, and clinical outcomes, and the other tools need to be validated in future high-quality studies despite their correlation.

PROSPERO CRD42024586175.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** Malnutrition (MESH:D044342)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12545068/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12545068/full.md

## References

147 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12545068/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12545068