# Monitoring of Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm formation on platelet storage bag surfaces

**Authors:** Jolianne Matte, Sahra Fonseca, Jonathan Robidoux, Steve J. Charette, Marie-Pierre Cayer, Danny Brouard, Geelsu Hwang, Geelsu Hwang, Geelsu Hwang, Geelsu Hwang

PMC · DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0333558 · PLOS One · 2025-10-22

## TL;DR

This study examines how different materials of platelet storage bags affect the formation of Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms, finding that some materials promote biofilm growth under static conditions but not during typical storage.

## Contribution

The study introduces a systematic evaluation of PC storage bag materials for their influence on S. epidermidis biofilm formation under different environmental conditions.

## Key findings

- EVA coupons formed more biofilm than PVC-BTHC or TEHTM in TSB over seven days.
- Rough PVC-BTHC coupons formed more biofilm in PCs than smooth ones, but not in plasma.
- Under storage conditions, biofilm formation was limited regardless of bag material.

## Abstract

Platelet concentrates (PCs) are stored at 20–24˚C in a biologically favorable environment that may support bacterial growth. Staphylococcus epidermidis, a typical contaminant, can form biofilms in PCs, complicating detection and increasing the risk of transfusion-transmitted bacterial infections. The material composition and surface texture of PC storage bags may influence biofilm formation. The impact of different PC storage bag materials on S. epidermidis biofilm formation was evaluated using the ISO 4768:2023(E) crystal violet (CV) assay. Four surface conditions were tested: polyvinyl chloride (PVC) plasticized with n-butyryl-tri(n-hexyl)-citrate (BTHC) – both smooth and rough sides, PVC plasticized with tri-(2-ethylhexyl)-trimellitate (TEHTM) and ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA). Coupons and bags made from each material were used in the experiments. Biofilm-positive S. epidermidis was cultured in tryptic soy broth (TSB), PCs and plasma and added on plastic coupons under static conditions or directly in the bags with agitation. Bacterial enumeration and CV assay were performed on days 2, 5, and 7. In TSB, EVA coupons significantly formed more biofilm than the smooth side of PVC-BTHC or TEHTM over seven days. In PCs, more biofilm formed on the rough side of PVC-BTHC coupons than the smooth side, with no other differences between plastics, suggesting similar biofilm amount across PC bag materials in the presence of platelets. No biofilm was detected on coupons in plasma. Under continuous agitation and reduced oxygen levels, only the rough side of PVC-BTHC showed significant biofilm formation in TSB in PC storage bags over seven days. These findings highlight the need for standardized biofilm testing and suggest that some plastics are more conducive to biofilm formation under static conditions. However, during blood bank storage (i.e., continuous agitation and reduced oxygen levels), biofilm formation is limited, regardless of the platelet bag material, thereby reducing the risk of undetected bacterial contamination.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** n-butyryl-tri(n-hexyl)-citrate (PubChem CID 133914), tri-(2-ethylhexyl)-trimellitate (PubChem CID 18725), ethylene-vinyl acetate (PubChem CID 32742)
- **Species:** Staphylococcus epidermidis (taxon 1282)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** bacterial infections (MESH:D001424)
- **Chemicals:** oxygen (MESH:D010100), PVC (MESH:D011143), TEHTM (MESH:C036101), CV (MESH:D005840), BTHC (-)
- **Species:** Staphylococcus epidermidis (species) [taxon 1282]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12543116/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12543116/full.md

## References

47 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12543116/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12543116