# A journey of partnership: Supporting Indigenous science in Western, colonial-grounded academic institutions

**Authors:** Heather J. A. Foulds, Leah J. Ferguson, Colin P. T. Baillie, Alexandra King, Lucie Lévesque, Tricia McGuire-Adams, Tara-Leigh F. McHugh, Kate Storey, Treena Delormier

PMC · DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0334949 · PLOS One · 2025-10-22

## TL;DR

This paper explores how Western academic institutions can better support Indigenous science by transforming colonial practices and embracing Indigenous ways of knowing.

## Contribution

The study identifies specific institutional changes needed to authentically support Indigenous science within colonial academic frameworks.

## Key findings

- Four themes emerged from participant discussions: Building Bridges, Institutional Practice, Original Knowledges, and Multifaceted Identity.
- Recommendations include embedding respectful support, prioritizing Indigenous research, and valuing multiple worldviews.
- The study emphasizes the need for institutional transformation to meaningfully include Indigenous knowledge systems.

## Abstract

Engagement of Indigenous science (Indigenous research, knowledges, and processes) is increasingly recognized within institutions of higher learning, funding bodies, and publication outlets. Respectful and authentic support for Indigenous science requires transformations of Western, colonial-grounded knowledge and knowledge processes, bodies, and institutions to meaningfully and appropriately include Indigenous ways of knowing, being, and doing.

The objective of this study was to identify fundamental changes required to support Indigenous science within Western, colonial-grounded academic institutions focusing on “Identity and Colonial Institutions”.

In 2019, a three-day gathering of 18 Indigenous and non-Indigenous researchers and trainees, Elder/knowledge helper/knowledge keepers, and community members was held in Treaty 1 territory and birthplace of the Métis Nation. Through talking circles, participants shared their experiences working with Indigenous communities on projects involving Indigenous knowledges.

Thematic analysis drew meaning from the talking circles, identifying four main themes: 1) Building Bridges; 2) Institutional Practice; 3) Original Knowledges; and 4) Multifaceted Identity. Focusing on “Identity and Colonial Institutions” stemming from these themes, recommendations for supporting Indigenous science were identified around four central actions: 1) Embedding respectful and authentic support; 2) Acceptance, endorsement, incorporation, and education among the broader research community; 3) Prioritizing and valuing Indigenous research, knowledges, processes, and contributions; and 4) Privileging of multiple worldviews.

Institutions, funding agencies, journals, and all individuals, organizations, and entities involved in research are encouraged to enact these recommendations and take action to support Indigenous science.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** Stroke (MESH:D020521)
- **Species:** Nicotiana tabacum (American tobacco, species) [taxon 4097], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12543104/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12543104/full.md

## References

56 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12543104/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12543104