# GEMsembler: consensus model assembly and structural comparison of genome-scale metabolic models across tools improve functional performance

**Authors:** Elena K. Matveishina, Bartosz J. Bartmanski, Sara Benito-Vaquerizo, Maria Zimmermann-Kogadeeva

PMC · DOI: 10.1128/msystems.00574-25 · mSystems · 2025-09-08

## TL;DR

GEMsembler is a tool that combines genome-scale metabolic models from different sources to improve their accuracy and reliability for predicting metabolic functions.

## Contribution

GEMsembler introduces a novel method for consensus model assembly and structural comparison of GEMs, enhancing predictive performance through integration of multiple models.

## Key findings

- Consensus models built with GEMsembler outperform gold-standard models in predicting auxotrophy and gene essentiality.
- Optimizing gene-protein-reaction combinations from consensus models improves predictions even in manually curated models.
- GEMsembler identifies key pathways and GPR alternatives to explain model performance and guide experimental validation.

## Abstract

Genome-scale metabolic models (GEMs) are widely used in systems biology to investigate metabolism and predict perturbation responses. Automatic GEM reconstruction tools generate GEMs with different properties and predictive capacities for the same organism. Since different models can excel at different tasks, combining them can increase metabolic network certainty and enhance model performance. Here, we introduce GEMsembler, a Python package designed to compare cross-tool GEMs, track the origin of model features, and build consensus models containing any subset of the input models. GEMsembler provides comprehensive analysis functionality, including identification and visualization of biosynthesis pathways, growth assessment, and an agreement-based curation workflow. GEMsembler-curated consensus models built from four Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and Escherichia coli automatically reconstructed models outperform the gold-standard models in auxotrophy and gene essentiality predictions. Optimizing gene-protein-reaction (GPR) combinations from consensus models improves gene essentiality predictions, even in the manually curated gold-standard models. GEMsembler explains model performance by highlighting relevant metabolic pathways and GPR alternatives, informing experiments to resolve model uncertainty. Thus, GEMsembler facilitates building more accurate and biologically informed metabolic models for systems biology applications.

Genome-scale metabolic models (GEMs) capture our knowledge of cellular metabolism as encoded in the genome, enabling us to describe and predict how cells function under different conditions. While several automated tools can generate these models directly from genome data, the resulting models often contain gaps and uncertainties, highlighting areas where our metabolic knowledge is incomplete. Here, we introduce a new tool called GEMsembler, which integrates GEMs constructed by different methods, evaluate model uncertainty, and build consensus models, harnessing the unique features of each approach. These consensus models more accurately reflect experimentally observed metabolic traits, such as nutrient requirements and condition-specific gene essentiality. GEMsembler facilitates comprehensive analysis of model structure and function, helping to pinpoint knowledge gaps and prioritize experiments to address them. By synthesizing information from diverse sources, GEMsembler accelerates the development of more reliable and biologically meaningful models, advancing research in metabolic engineering, pathogen biology, and microbial community studies.

## Linked entities

- **Species:** Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (taxon 1590), Escherichia coli (taxon 562)

## Full-text entities

- **Species:** Escherichia coli (E. coli, species) [taxon 562]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12542698/full.md

## Figures

5 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12542698/full.md

## References

62 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12542698/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12542698