# Long-term outcome of bail-out ViV-TAVI at index procedure

**Authors:** Isabel Horn, Hazem Omran, Sabine Bleiziffer, Smita Scholtz, Kai Friedrichs, Cornelia Piper, Johanna Bormann, Sara Waezsada, Max Potratz, René Schramm, Volker Rudolph, Tanja K. Rudolph

PMC · DOI: 10.1007/s00392-025-02640-5 · Clinical Research in Cardiology · 2025-04-29

## TL;DR

This study compares outcomes of patients who needed a second valve during a failed heart valve procedure with those who had a successful first procedure.

## Contribution

The study provides long-term mortality data and procedural outcomes for bail-out valve-in-valve TAVI procedures.

## Key findings

- Bail-out ViV-TAVI had significantly higher long-term mortality compared to successful TAVI.
- Bail-out procedures were associated with longer intervention times and higher pacemaker implantation rates.
- Valve embolization and migration were the most common reasons for bail-out procedures.

## Abstract

This study aimed to compare in-hospital and long-term outcomes of patients with bail-out valve-in-valve TAVI due to a primarily failed transcatheter aortic valves procedure (bViV-TAVI) versus a successful transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).

We recorded bViV-TAVI procedures at our center from February 2011 to March 2022. Primary endpoint was long-term mortality. In-hospital mortality, stroke, acute kidney failure, need for new permanent pacemaker, and duration of intervention were secondary endpoints.

4555 patients undergoing TAVI were retrospectively included. 231 matched (77:154) patients were analyzed. BViV-TAVI was a rare event (1.9%). In 76.7% of the cases transcatheter valve embolization and migration were the reasons for implanting a second valve in the same procedure. Significant PVL accounted for bViV-TAVI in 23.4% of the patients. The duration of the intervention was significantly longer for the bViV-TAVI group (p < 0.001). BViV-TAVI patients showed higher rates of a new permanent pacemaker implantation (p = 0.013) and the postprocedural mean pressure was significantly higher (p = 0.03). Concerning the other secondary endpoints there was a trend for a higher event rate in bVIV-TAVI patients which did not reach significant difference. After an average follow-up period of 4.9 ± 3.0 years, mortality was significantly higher in the bViV-TAVI group (54.5% vs. 39.0%, p = 0.025).

The implantation of a second valve during the same procedure as bail-out is a feasible alternative treatment option in patients with failed transcatheter aortic valve procedures. However, increased long-term mortality must be taken into account.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00392-025-02640-5.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** stroke (MESH:D020521), acute kidney failure (MESH:D058186)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12540624/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12540624/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12540624