# Impact of artifact reduction on dimensional accuracy of sealing materials for furcal perforations in CBCT

**Authors:** Caroline Cristina BORGES, Jardel Francisco MAZZI-CHAVES, Jesus Djalma PÉCORA, Bruno Correa AZEVEDO, Giampiero ROSSI-FEDELE, Mike BUENO, Manoel Damião SOUSA-NETO, Carlos ESTRELA

PMC · DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2025.vol39.097 · Brazilian Oral Research · 2025-10-20

## TL;DR

This study shows that using a blooming artifact reduction algorithm in CBCT scans maintains accurate measurements of materials used to repair dental perforations.

## Contribution

The study demonstrates the effectiveness of BAR algorithms in preserving dimensional accuracy for sealing materials in CBCT imaging.

## Key findings

- No significant differences were found between micrometer and CBCT measurements for sealing materials.
- BAR algorithms preserved dimensional accuracy for Biodentine, MTA ProRoot, MTAFlow, and amalgam.
- The e-Vol DX software with BAR algorithms is reliable for measuring sealing materials in CBCT images.

## Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the blooming artifact reduction (BAR) algorithm on the measurement of various sealing materials (Biodentine, MTA ProRoot, MTAFlow, and amalgam) for furcal perforation repair using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). A total of 105 extracted human mandibular first and second molars were prepared and root-filled. Furcal perforations were created, and the specimens were randomly organized into five groups based on the sealing material used: (1) Biodentine, (2) MTA ProRoot, (3) MTAFlow, (4) Amalgam, and (5) Control (no sealing material). After setting, the specimens were embedded in wax, and the crowns were sectioned to measure the diameter of the sealing materials using a digital micrometer. CBCT scans were acquired using the Prexion 3D Elite® CT scanner. The dimensional measurements of sealing materials on the CBCT images was measured using DICOM files and the e-Vol DX software measurement tool, configured to thousandths of a millimeter. BAR algorithms were applied as follows: BAR 3 for the control group, Biodentine, and MTAFlow; BAR 2 for MTA ProRoot; and BAR 1 for amalgam. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA and Tukey’s test with a significance level of 5%. No significant differences were observed between the diameters of sealing materials measured using the micrometer and those obtained from CBCT images processed with BAR algorithms (Biodentine, MTA ProRoot, MTAFlow, and amalgam). The BAR algorithm in the e-Vol DX software preserved the dimensional accuracy of CBCT images for the tested sealing materials.

## Linked entities

- **Species:** Homo sapiens (taxon 9606)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** perforations (MESH:D057112)
- **Chemicals:** Biodentine (MESH:C506393), MTA ProRoot (-)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12539771/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12539771/full.md

## References

38 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12539771/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12539771