# Gut inflammation is associated with structural spinal damage in axial spondyloarthritis – results from the observational SPARTAKUS cohort

## TL;DR

Gut inflammation in axial spondyloarthritis patients is linked to more severe spinal damage, even after adjusting for known risk factors.

## Contribution

This study shows for the first time that gut inflammation, measured by fecal calprotectin, is associated with structural spinal damage in axial spondyloarthritis.

## Key findings

- Higher fecal calprotectin levels correlate with increased spinal damage scores in axSpA patients.
- Elevated fecal calprotectin is associated with a higher likelihood of above-median spinal damage scores.
- The association remains significant after adjusting for factors like HLA-B27 status and treatment.

## Abstract

In axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), 5–10% of patients have comorbid inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Beyond that, 50–60% display histologic inflammation in ileum/colon biopsies, and fecal calprotectin (F-calprotectin) is elevated in relation to healthy controls. Prior studies have shown such, often subclinical, gut inflammation in axSpA to be associated with more active disease, as measured by clinical indices as well as magnetic resonance imaging – both known risk factors for structural spinal damage development. In light of this, in the current study we aimed to examine whether gut inflammation, assessed by F-calprotectin, is associated with more structural spinal damage in axSpA.

Patients with well-characterized non-radiographic or radiographic axSpA (nr-axSpA/r-axSpA; n = 76/152), according to ASAS or modified New York criteria, enrolled in a population-based cohort study in southern Sweden, were assessed for structural spinal damage (modified Stoke ankylosing spondylitis spinal score [mSASSS]) and gut inflammation (F-calprotectin). mSASSS values were compared between patients with normal (< 50 mg/kg), moderately elevated (50–149 mg/kg) or distinctly elevated (≥ 150 mg/kg) F-calprotectin, reflecting no/some/evident gut inflammation, respectively (one-way ANOVA). Moreover, logistic regression was applied to explore if elevated F-calprotectin (≥ 50 mg/kg) was associated with mSASSS values above the median, adjusted for sex, symptom duration, HLA-B27 status, smoking, CRP, NSAID and anti-TNF therapy. Analyses limited to r-axSpA were also performed.

In both axSpA patients overall and separately in r-axSpA, mSASSS distributions differed significantly between subjects with normal/moderately/distinctly elevated F-calprotectin, with more damage observed in those with higher F-calprotectin levels. Furthermore, elevated F-calprotectin (≥ 50 mg/kg) was associated with mSASSS values above the median, in both the entire axSpA group (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.2 [95%CI 1.1–4.2]); and in r-axSpA alone (adjusted OR 2.9 [1.2–7.1]).

In the current study, the presence of gut inflammation, assessed by F-calprotectin, was cross-sectionally associated with more structural damage in the spine in patients with axSpA, even after adjustments for known risk factors for spinal damage. Prospective studies are, however, needed to investigate whether gut inflammation may be a predictor of spinal radiographic progression in axSpA.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13075-025-03663-z.