# Extinction of Heroin Seeking Does Not Require the Infralimbic Cortex or Its Projections to the Nucleus Accumbens Shell or Amygdala

**Authors:** Matthew S. McGregor, Kelle E. Nett, Subhash C. Gupta, John A. Wemmie, Ryan T. LaLumiere

PMC · DOI: 10.1111/adb.70092 · Addiction Biology · 2025-10-21

## TL;DR

This study shows that the brain circuits involved in stopping heroin-seeking behavior are different from those for cocaine, suggesting drug-specific mechanisms in addiction recovery.

## Contribution

The study reveals that heroin extinction learning does not depend on the infralimbic cortex or its projections, unlike cocaine.

## Key findings

- Optogenetic inhibition of the infralimbic cortex or its projections had no effect on heroin extinction learning.
- Females self-administered more heroin than males in 3-hour sessions, showing sex differences in heroin taking.
- Extinction retention was unaffected by the manipulations, indicating distinct neural mechanisms for heroin versus cocaine.

## Abstract

Evidence indicates that the activity of the infralimbic cortex (IL), as well as its projections to the nucleus accumbens shell (NAshell) and amygdala, following an unreinforced lever press is critical for cocaine extinction learning and retention. It is unclear whether the same neural circuitry is involved in extinction encoding for other classes of addictive drugs, including opioids. In this study, we used a behaviour‐controlled optogenetic approach in female and male Sprague–Dawley rats to examine the role of the IL and its projections in the extinction of heroin seeking. Rats first underwent 12+ days of 6‐ or 3‐h heroin self‐administration sessions, followed by 12 days of extinction training. Optogenetic inhibition of the IL, IL‐NAshell or IL‐amygdala pathway was given for 20 s immediately following an unreinforced lever press during the first 5 days of extinction. Unlike cocaine extinction, these manipulations had no effect on lever pressing during extinction training, nor on the retention of extinction learning, as assessed during the subsequent 7 days of extinction without optogenetic inhibition. These results suggest that the extinction of heroin seeking does not involve the same infralimbic mechanisms that are critical for the extinction of cocaine seeking. Although extinction learning did not differ by sex, analyses of self‐administration data revealed that females self‐administered more heroin than males in 3 h, but not 6 h, self‐administration sessions, indicating session length‐dependent sex differences in heroin taking.

This study found that optogenetic inhibition of the infralimbic cortex, or infralimbic projections to the nucleus accumbens shell or amygdala, following unreinforced lever presses had no effect on extinction of heroin seeking in rats. Similar manipulations impaired cocaine extinction learning in the authors’ prior work, indicating that the neural mechanisms of extinction learning are drug‐type dependent.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** heroin (PubChem CID 5462328)

## Full-text entities

- **Chemicals:** Heroin (MESH:D003932), cocaine (MESH:D003042), addictive drugs (-)
- **Species:** Rattus norvegicus (brown rat, species) [taxon 10116]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12538630/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12538630/full.md

## References

39 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12538630/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12538630