# Effects of Intensive Systolic Blood Pressure Control on Kidney Outcomes in Patients With and Without CKD: A Post Hoc Analysis of SPRINT and ACCORD‐BP Trials

**Authors:** Xiaoli Xu, Xuan Zhao, Yi Ding, Xianglin Wu, Qiuyu Cao, Kan Wang, Yu Xiang, Siyu Wang, Xiaoyun Zhang, Min Xu, Tiange Wang, Zhiyun Zhao, Yuhong Chen, Jieli Lu, Yufang Bi, Mian Li, Yu Xu

PMC · DOI: 10.1111/1753-0407.70162 · Journal of Diabetes · 2025-10-21

## TL;DR

Intensive blood pressure control reduces kidney failure risk in patients with CKD but does not significantly affect those without CKD.

## Contribution

This study provides new evidence on the differential effects of intensive blood pressure control on kidney outcomes in patients with and without CKD.

## Key findings

- Intensive BP control reduced renal failure risk in CKD patients (HR = 0.46).
- Intensive BP control increased CKD progression to moderate/high risk but not to very high risk.
- Albuminuria risk decreased with intensive BP control in both CKD and non-CKD groups.

## Abstract

The effects of intensive blood pressure (BP) control on adverse kidney outcomes remain undetermined.

This post hoc analysis included the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) participants and the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Blood Pressure (ACCORD‐BP) participants receiving standard glucose‐lowering treatment and satisfying SPRINT eligibility criteria. The risks of kidney events between intensive (systolic BP < 120 mmHg) and standard (systolic BP < 140 mmHg) controls in participants with or without baseline chronic kidney disease (CKD) were compared using Cox proportional hazards models.

A total of 10,946 participants (2724 with CKD and 8222 without CKD) were included. During the intervention and post‐intervention periods, the risk of renal failure was either reduced by intensive BP control in participants with CKD (HR = 0.46; 95% CI = 0.22–0.97) or was not significantly different between intensive and standard BP control in participants without CKD (HR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.52–1.49; p
interaction = 0.128). The risk of ≥ 30% reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was increased and the risk of albuminuria was decreased by intensive BP control in participants with or without CKD. Intensive BP control increased the risk of CKD progression to moderate‐ or high‐risk category, but not to very‐high risk category according to the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) risk categories.

The intensive BP control might increase the risk of mild CKD progression but not of more advanced CKD progression or renal failure compared with the standard BP control.

Kaplan‐Meier curves of the cumulative incidence of renal failure by BP control groups in participants with or without CKD at baseline. (A) Cumulative incidence during the intervention period in participants with CKD at baseline. (B) Cumulative incidence during the intervention period in participants without CKD at baseline. (C) Cumulative incidence during the intervention and post‐intervention observational periods in participants with CKD at baseline. (D) Cumulative incidence during the intervention and post‐intervention observational periods in participants without CKD at baseline. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were not adjusted.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** chronic kidney disease (MONDO:0005300), renal failure (MONDO:0001106)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** CKD (MESH:D051436), renal failure (MESH:D051437), Kidney Disease (MESH:D007674), albuminuria (MESH:D000419), Diabetes (MESH:D003920)
- **Chemicals:** glucose (MESH:D005947)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12538231/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12538231/full.md

## References

33 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12538231/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12538231