# Multimodal 3D-printed passive samplers to monitor, model and prioritise in situ pharmaceutical and pesticide pollution risks to an aquatic freshwater invertebrate, Gammarus pulex

**Authors:** Alexandra K. Richardson, Stephen Stürzenbaum, David A. Cowan, David J. Neep, Leon P. Barron

PMC · DOI: 10.1039/d5em00452g · Environmental Science. Processes & Impacts · 2025-10-14

## TL;DR

Researchers developed 3D-printed devices to monitor pollutants in freshwater and assess their impact on a key aquatic invertebrate species.

## Contribution

A new 3D-printed passive sampling method was introduced to estimate pollution risks to aquatic invertebrates using multimodal data.

## Key findings

- 3D-printed passive samplers detected more contaminants than water or invertebrate samples.
- Strong correlations between passive samplers and biomonitoring data suggest direct risk inference is possible.
- Neonicotinoid pesticides and antidepressants were among the most concentrated contaminants in the invertebrate species.

## Abstract

Calibrated 3D-printed multi-modal passive sampler devices (3D-PSDs) were used herein both to monitor contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) in freshwater and to estimate in situ chemical toxic and effect units for the aquatic invertebrate, Gammarus pulex, to support prioritisation strategies. A six-month study of water, biota, and 3D-PSDs in a heavily wastewater-impacted urban river catchment in London revealed 112 CECs detected, including pesticides, pharmaceuticals, illicit drugs and transformation products (water = 50; 3D-PSDs = 99; and G. pulex = 58 CECs). In G. pulex, the top three most concentrated CECs were citalopram (an antidepressant, at 101 ± 11 ng g−1), imidacloprid and clothianidin (both neonicotinoid pesticides, at 63 ± 12 and 52 ± 39 ng g−1, respectively). Principal component analysis revealed that passive sampler data represented chemical occurrence in the G. pulex better than using water data. Strong correlations existed between the passive sampler and biomonitoring data (R2 > 0.84, p < 0.05) indicating a possibility to infer risk from the device directly and without using calibrated PSD uptake rates (Rs). This new approach showed promise as a potentially cost-effective way to rapidly prioritise sites and CECs for large-scale risk assessment campaigns for these species.

Multimodal 3D-printed passive sampler devices (3D-PSDs) were used to monitor contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) in freshwater and to estimate chemical toxic and effect units in a benthic invertebrate.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** citalopram (PubChem CID 2771), imidacloprid (PubChem CID 86287518), clothianidin (PubChem CID 86287519)
- **Species:** Gammarus pulex (taxon 52641)

## Full-text entities

- **Chemicals:** imidacloprid (MESH:C082359), water (MESH:D014867), citalopram (MESH:D015283), PSD (-), clothianidin (MESH:C480342), CECs (MESH:C051731)
- **Species:** Gammarus pulex (species) [taxon 52641]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12536334/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12536334/full.md

## References

75 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12536334/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12536334